OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
sca-j
73 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Re: [sca-j] CAA Spec - WD-01 First Pass - RFC 2119 and Editorial Cleanup
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 30 Apr 2008 13:16:04 -0000
Re: [sca-j] CAA Spec - WD-01 First Pass - RFC 2119 and Editorial Cleanup
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 30 Apr 2008 12:09:10 -0000
Re: [sca-j] CAA Spec - WD-01 First Pass - RFC 2119 and Editorial Cleanup
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 29 Apr 2008 20:11:34 -0000
NEW ISSUE: @Reference annotation can also be used on a constructorparameter.
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 28 Apr 2008 19:44:49 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Incorrect examples of methods annotated @Init and @Destroy
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 28 Apr 2008 19:37:03 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Inconsistent method description for @Init and @Destroyannotations
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 28 Apr 2008 19:27:40 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Incorrect interface name - Java Common Annotations and APIs v1.0- Sec1.7.5
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 28 Apr 2008 19:21:48 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Incorrect example in Java Component Implementation Spec v1.00 -Sec 1.2.4
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 28 Apr 2008 19:18:22 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Incorrect interface name - Java Common Annotations and APIsv1.0 - Sec 1.7.5
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 28 Apr 2008 12:52:36 -0000
Re: [sca-j] @Reference annotation on setter method parameter or the methoditself?
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 28 Apr 2008 12:43:14 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Incorrect interface name - Java Common Annotations and APIsv1.0 - Sec 1.7.5
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 28 Apr 2008 11:51:49 -0000
Re: [sca-j] @Reference annotation on setter method parameter or the methoditself?
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 28 Apr 2008 11:46:50 -0000
Re: [sca-j] @Reference annotation on setter method parameter or the methoditself?
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 28 Apr 2008 11:10:14 -0000
Inconsistent method description for @Init and @Destroy annotations
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 28 Apr 2008 05:11:34 -0000
Re: [sca-j] @Reference annotation on setter method parameter or the methoditself?
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 28 Apr 2008 04:06:37 -0000
Re: [sca-j] A few more corrections in Java Common Annotations and APIs v1.0
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 28 Apr 2008 03:45:13 -0000
Re: [sca-j] @Reference annotation on setter method parameter or the methoditself?
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 27 Apr 2008 21:30:50 -0000
Re: [sca-j] A few more corrections in Java Common Annotations and APIs v1.0
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 27 Apr 2008 21:30:47 -0000
A few more corrections in Java Common Annotations and APIs v1.0
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 26 Apr 2008 17:37:05 -0000
Incorrect interface name - Java Common Annotations and APIs v1.0 - Sec1.7.5
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 26 Apr 2008 14:46:05 -0000
@Reference annotation on setter method parameter or the method itself?
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 26 Apr 2008 08:51:46 -0000
Re: [sca-j] SCA-J package names
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 25 Apr 2008 22:11:33 -0000
Incorrect example in Java Component Implementation Spec - Sec 1.2.4
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 25 Apr 2008 17:30:43 -0000
raw chat log minutes - April 24
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 24 Apr 2008 18:18:29 -0000
Re: [sca-j] SCA-J package names
From
Roberto Chinnici <Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM> on 24 Apr 2008 16:16:35 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
nash@uk.ibm.com on 24 Apr 2008 13:32:09 -0000
ISSUE 38: Inconsistent rules for the use of @reference annotation
From
"Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com> on 24 Apr 2008 13:27:21 -0000
RE: [sca-j] SCA-J package names
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 24 Apr 2008 11:58:09 -0000
Re: [sca-j] SCA-J package names
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 24 Apr 2008 11:28:46 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Inconsistent rules for the use of @referenceannotation
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 24 Apr 2008 05:59:00 -0000
Chat log from last week's call
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 24 Apr 2008 02:02:33 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Inconsistent rules for the use of @reference annotation
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 23 Apr 2008 19:30:33 -0000
Protected field computed as a reference for an unannotated javaimplementation
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 22 Apr 2008 18:20:48 -0000
Protected field computed as a reference for an unannotated javaimplementation
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 22 Apr 2008 18:16:09 -0000
ISSUE 37: Injection on private fields - or not
From
"Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com> on 17 Apr 2008 17:11:04 -0000
Groups - Java Common Annotations and APIs - WD-01 (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-WD-01.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 17 Apr 2008 12:32:58 -0000
CAA Spec - WD-01 First Pass - RFC 2119 and Editorial Cleanup
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 17 Apr 2008 12:30:55 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 25 - Callback Simplification
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 17 Apr 2008 04:11:20 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mrowley@bea.com on 16 Apr 2008 21:29:03 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Injection on private fields - or not
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 16 Apr 2008 12:35:52 -0000
OASIS Open CSA Member Section Steering Committee Nominations <Now Open> and Elections
From
"Dee Schur" <dee.schur@oasis-open.org> on 14 Apr 2008 21:33:02 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-04-10 (Meeting Minutes 10-04-2008.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 14 Apr 2008 09:01:30 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-04-10 (Meeting Minutes 10-04-2008.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 14 Apr 2008 08:11:50 -0000
Raw chat log from meeting 10th April 2008
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 11 Apr 2008 13:37:29 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 25 - Callback Simplification
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 10 Apr 2008 20:37:44 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 25 - Callback Simplification
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 10 Apr 2008 20:26:38 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-28: Package Name Changes
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 10 Apr 2008 16:47:03 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 23 - Asynchronous Client interface to Synchronous Servicenot well described in Java Common Annotations & APIs Specification
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 10 Apr 2008 15:58:55 -0000
ISSUE 36: RequestContext.getServiceReference description is unclear.
From
"Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com> on 10 Apr 2008 15:38:29 -0000
AW: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: RequestContext.getServiceReference description is unclear.
From
"Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com> on 10 Apr 2008 15:34:58 -0000
ISSUE 35: The ServiceReference interface should extend Serializable
From
"Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com> on 10 Apr 2008 15:33:28 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 10 Apr 2008 15:21:14 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 25 - Callback Simplification
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 10 Apr 2008 14:42:39 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 10 Apr 2008 14:42:32 -0000
Proposal for API to permit Unmanaged Java code to create a new component ina Domain
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 10 Apr 2008 14:29:44 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 10 Apr 2008 06:33:25 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-28: Package Name Changes
From
Roberto Chinnici <Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM> on 9 Apr 2008 16:33:22 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mrowley@bea.com on 9 Apr 2008 16:28:38 -0000
NEW ISSUE: RequestContext.getServiceReference description is unclear.
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 9 Apr 2008 16:19:00 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-28: Package Name Changes
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 9 Apr 2008 12:59:48 -0000
NEW ISSUE: The ServiceReference interface should extend Serializable
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 9 Apr 2008 09:49:18 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 25 - Callback Simplification
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 8 Apr 2008 20:38:39 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-04-03 (Meeting Minutes 3-4-2008.doc) uploaded
From
ron.barack@sap.com on 7 Apr 2008 15:21:00 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 25 - Callback Simplification
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 4 Apr 2008 11:56:49 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 25 - Callback Simplification
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 4 Apr 2008 11:03:45 -0000
SCA-J package names
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 4 Apr 2008 03:36:12 -0000
Raw contents of chat from meeting 3.4.08
From
"Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com> on 3 Apr 2008 18:07:56 -0000
WG: implementation.client quick writeup
From
"Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com> on 3 Apr 2008 18:01:48 -0000
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 25 - Callback Simplification
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 3 Apr 2008 16:53:19 -0000
Fw: [sca-j] ISSUE 25 - Callback Simplification
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 3 Apr 2008 15:46:05 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
nash@uk.ibm.com on 3 Apr 2008 13:03:55 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 23 - Asynchronous Client interface to Synchronous Servicenot well described in Java Common Annotations & APIs Specification
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 3 Apr 2008 11:17:15 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Composite Scoped components should be able toimplement Conversational interfaces
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 1 Apr 2008 11:44:04 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2