OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
sca-j
94 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25: Revised proposal for non-conversational callbacks
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 30 Sep 2008 18:08:24 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 29 Sep 2008 18:52:23 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-09-29 (SCA Java minutes 2008-09-29.pdf) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 29 Sep 2008 18:31:06 -0000
Minutes for TC Meeting of 29th September 2008
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 29 Sep 2008 16:37:38 -0000
ISSUE 25: Revised proposal for non-conversational callbacks
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 29 Sep 2008 14:30:54 -0000
Next SCA-J Telecon - Sept 29 - is on
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 22 Sep 2008 19:12:45 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 22 Sep 2008 18:31:12 -0000
ISSUE-82 Inconsistent use of a and an when referring to annotations
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 22 Sep 2008 18:24:45 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-09-22.doc (SCA Java Minutes 2008-09-22.doc) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 22 Sep 2008 18:07:06 -0000
Groups - SCA-J_Issues_List.html (SCA-J_Issues_List.html) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 22 Sep 2008 17:43:44 -0000
Raw text of Sep 22nd meeting minutes
From
"Pradeep Simha" <psimha@tibco.com> on 22 Sep 2008 16:01:42 -0000
Re: ISSUE 48: Proposal
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 22 Sep 2008 15:43:23 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 22 Sep 2008 14:50:04 -0000
Re: ISSUE 49: Version requirements for SDO, JAXB and JAX-WS
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 22 Sep 2008 14:33:02 -0000
Resolutions for issues 20, 40, 42, 43
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 22 Sep 2008 14:09:22 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 22 Sep 2008 13:56:17 -0000
JEE Subcommittee status
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 22 Sep 2008 13:03:21 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 19 Sep 2008 20:28:15 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-09-15.doc uploaded
From
oasis@cjnash.com on 18 Sep 2008 10:43:15 -0000
ISSUE-80: Ambiguous description of method for @OneWay annotation
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 17 Sep 2008 14:33:29 -0000
ISSUE-78: Need API to set EPR and for a reference invocation
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 17 Sep 2008 14:33:13 -0000
ISSUE-81: Normative references to SCA Spec docs point to v1.00 docs
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 17 Sep 2008 14:32:38 -0000
ISSUE-79: Missing word "type" for "return type" in CAA spec - sec 3.1
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 17 Sep 2008 14:28:50 -0000
ISSUE-77: A remotable service SHOULD be translatable into a generallyaccepted standard for a service, such as WSDL 1.1 or WSDL 2.0
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 17 Sep 2008 14:23:32 -0000
ISSUE-76: Incorrect code in section 6.7.4 examples
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 17 Sep 2008 14:17:22 -0000
ISSUE-75: Incorrect description of @Scope annotation default
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 17 Sep 2008 14:14:17 -0000
ISSUE-74: Clarify meaning of "should implement"
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 17 Sep 2008 14:14:02 -0000
ISSUE-72: Should not say callback ID is passed in reference parameters
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 17 Sep 2008 14:09:38 -0000
ISSUE-73: Incorrect reference to "original request"
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 17 Sep 2008 14:09:33 -0000
ISSUE-68: Uniqueness of conversation IDs
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 17 Sep 2008 14:06:09 -0000
ISSUE-71: Incorrect code in section 6.7.2 example
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 17 Sep 2008 14:02:34 -0000
ISSUE-69: Misleading statement about lifetime of stateful callbacks
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 17 Sep 2008 13:55:36 -0000
ISSUE-70: ConversationAttributes on class or interface?
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 17 Sep 2008 13:55:34 -0000
ISSUE-67: Need normative rules for stateful callbacks
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 17 Sep 2008 13:52:25 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: A remotable service SHOULD be translatable into agenerally accepted standard for a service, such as WSDL 1.1 or WSDL 2.0
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 16 Sep 2008 07:54:51 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Normative references to SCA Spec docs point to v1.00 docs
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 16 Sep 2008 06:24:58 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Ambiguous description of method for @OneWay annotation
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 16 Sep 2008 06:06:35 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Missing word "type" for "return type" in CAA spec - sec 3.1
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 16 Sep 2008 05:58:05 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Need API to set EPR and for a reference invocation
From
"Pradeep Simha" <psimha@tibco.com> on 16 Sep 2008 01:43:56 -0000
NEW ISSUE: A remotable service SHOULD be translatable into a generally accepted standard for a service, such as WSDL 1.1 or WSDL 2.0
From
"Pradeep Simha" <psimha@tibco.com> on 16 Sep 2008 01:01:31 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Incorrect code in section 6.7.4 examples
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Sep 2008 22:09:30 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Incorrect description of @Scope annotation default
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Sep 2008 21:52:34 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Clarify meaning of "should implement"
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Sep 2008 21:34:03 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Incorrect reference to "original request"
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Sep 2008 21:27:17 -0000
Incorrect reference to "original request"
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Sep 2008 21:25:47 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Should not say callback ID is passed in reference parameters
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Sep 2008 21:21:05 -0000
Incorrect code in section 6.7.4 examples
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Sep 2008 21:15:48 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Incorrect code in section 6.7.2 example
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Sep 2008 20:58:56 -0000
NEW ISSUE: ConversationAttributes on class or interface?
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Sep 2008 20:47:53 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Misleading statement about lifetime of stateful callbacks
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Sep 2008 20:40:54 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Need normative rules for stateful callbacks
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Sep 2008 20:23:52 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Uniqueness of conversation IDs
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Sep 2008 20:17:55 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Inconsistent use of a and an when referring to annotations
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 15 Sep 2008 16:08:20 -0000
Re: [sca-j] SCA-J Working Draft 04 Review Comments
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 15 Sep 2008 15:23:34 -0000
Re: [sca-j] SCA-J Working Draft 04 Review Comments
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 15 Sep 2008 15:16:13 -0000
Re: [sca-j] SCA-J Working Draft 04 Review Comments
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 15 Sep 2008 14:44:35 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Should the definitions of the various Scopes be pushed up to the SCA-Assembly specification? - JAVA-66
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 15 Sep 2008 10:50:24 -0000
SCA-J Working Draft 04 Review Comments
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 15 Sep 2008 10:48:36 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 12 Sep 2008 13:23:38 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components - JAVA-65
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 11 Sep 2008 14:23:52 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Should the definitions of the various Scopes be pushed up to the SCA-Assembly specification?
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 11 Sep 2008 14:23:46 -0000
NEW ISSUE: There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 11 Sep 2008 13:46:23 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: SCA Spring C & I specification does not state the purpose of sca:composite element - JAVA-64
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 11 Sep 2008 13:12:49 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: SCA Spring C & I specification does not state whether Constructor Injection should be supported - JAVA-63
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 11 Sep 2008 13:11:05 -0000
Re: [sca-j] A couple of problems that we have previously discussed but havenot yet raised issues for them
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 11 Sep 2008 12:46:45 -0000
[sca-j] NEW ISSUE: SCA Spring C & I specification does not state thepurpose of sca:composite element
From
Ramkumar R1 <ramkumar_rj@in.ibm.com> on 11 Sep 2008 11:44:52 -0000
[sca-j] NEW ISSUE: SCA Spring C & I specification does not state whetherConstructor Injection should be supported
From
Ramkumar R1 <ramkumar_rj@in.ibm.com> on 11 Sep 2008 11:37:46 -0000
A couple of problems that we have previously discussed but have not yet raised issues for them
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 11 Sep 2008 10:48:44 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Clarify what a Component Implementation can do with threads - JAVA-62
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 11 Sep 2008 10:30:55 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Clarify what a Component Implementation can do with threads
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 11 Sep 2008 10:21:07 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Date for the next SCA-J Face 2 Face Meeting - request to change it from the SCA-Binding TC
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 11 Sep 2008 09:23:39 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-09-08.doc uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 11 Sep 2008 09:07:18 -0000
Raw chat log of SCA-J call on September 8th
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 11 Sep 2008 08:42:29 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Describe the concurrency model for each scope
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 11 Sep 2008 08:38:10 -0000
Need to appoint a replacement Liaison Committee representative
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 11 Sep 2008 06:55:33 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Describe the concurrency model for each scope
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 10 Sep 2008 16:40:42 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 10 Sep 2008 10:05:05 -0000
Change of email address
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 8 Sep 2008 22:55:36 -0000
Raw minutes SCA Java 2008-09-08
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 8 Sep 2008 16:05:52 -0000
Can a single Component expose a mix of @Remotable and non-@Remotable Services?
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 8 Sep 2008 14:40:01 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
nash@uk.ibm.com on 8 Sep 2008 14:22:25 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Conference Call) added
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 7 Sep 2008 05:44:33 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 5 Sep 2008 14:55:18 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Date for the next SCA-J Face 2 Face Meeting - request to changeit from the SCA-Binding TC
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 5 Sep 2008 09:11:10 -0000
Date for the next SCA-J Face 2 Face Meeting - request to change it from the SCA-Binding TC
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 4 Sep 2008 14:15:13 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Sharing Java artifacts across contributions
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 4 Sep 2008 13:48:56 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-08-18.doc uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 4 Sep 2008 12:26:01 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Conference Call) cancelled
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 4 Sep 2008 10:05:30 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Conference Call) cancelled
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 4 Sep 2008 10:05:01 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf cancelled
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 4 Sep 2008 10:04:14 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Conference Call) added
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 4 Sep 2008 10:03:10 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf uncancelled
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 4 Sep 2008 09:50:12 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf cancelled
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 4 Sep 2008 09:45:42 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf cancelled
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 4 Sep 2008 09:45:09 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2