OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
ws-rx
301 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Re: [ws-rx] Proposed NEW ISSUE: Alignment and Refinement of Definitions for Delivery Assurances
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 30 Sep 2005 15:07:51 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] TC Conference calls
From
"Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com> on 29 Sep 2005 23:28:34 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposed NEW ISSUE: Alignment and Refinement of Definitions for Delivery Assurances
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 29 Sep 2005 18:44:06 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Relationship of ISSUE 008 with ISSUE 021
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 29 Sep 2005 17:51:56 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Relationship of ISSUE 008 with ISSUE 021
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 29 Sep 2005 16:15:56 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Proposed NEW ISSUE: Alignment and Refinement of Definitionsfor Delivery Assurances
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 29 Sep 2005 16:00:31 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Relationship of ISSUE 008 with ISSUE 021
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 29 Sep 2005 15:34:36 -0000
Relationship of ISSUE 008 with ISSUE 021
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 29 Sep 2005 15:23:31 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Proposed NEW ISSUE: Alignment and Refinement of Definitions forDelivery Assurances
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 28 Sep 2005 18:16:35 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Proposed NEW ISSUE: Alignment and Refinement of Definitionsfor Delivery Assurances
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 28 Sep 2005 17:49:19 -0000
Proposed NEW ISSUE: Alignment and Refinement of Definitions for DeliveryAssurances
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 28 Sep 2005 17:17:44 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] TC Conference calls
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 28 Sep 2005 02:20:08 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Action Item list updated
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 27 Sep 2005 20:24:26 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] TC Conference calls
From
"Abbie Barbir" <abbieb@nortel.com> on 27 Sep 2005 19:18:24 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] TC Conference calls
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 27 Sep 2005 17:48:19 -0000
Action item #0042
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 27 Sep 2005 17:35:57 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] TC Conference calls
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 27 Sep 2005 17:17:44 -0000
Action Item list updated
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 27 Sep 2005 17:05:45 -0000
Groups - Action Item Closed: #0030 Proposal for i003
From
tom@coastin.com on 27 Sep 2005 16:52:55 -0000
Posted minutes for 9/15 and Face to FAce meetings
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 27 Sep 2005 16:48:32 -0000
Groups - Minutes WSRX TC F2F Sept 21 and 22, 2005 (MinutesWSRXF2f-0905.htm) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 27 Sep 2005 16:47:54 -0000
TC Conference calls
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 27 Sep 2005 16:46:39 -0000
Groups - Minutes WSRx TC Teleconf 9/15/2005 (MinutesWSRXSept15th.htm) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 27 Sep 2005 16:44:29 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
paul@wso2.com on 27 Sep 2005 16:23:54 -0000
This week's call cancelled
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 27 Sep 2005 16:09:11 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Prelim Thu AM F2f minutes
From
"Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com> on 27 Sep 2005 14:29:56 -0000
i030 proposed resolution
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 27 Sep 2005 13:42:25 -0000
Groups - ReliableMessagingIssues.xml (ReliableMessagingIssues.xml) uploaded
From
mgoodner@microsoft.com on 27 Sep 2005 00:20:49 -0000
Will post updated minutes Tuesday Morning
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 26 Sep 2005 19:14:56 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposed new issue: spec talks about delivery assurances but does not clearly relate them to the protocol
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 26 Sep 2005 19:09:13 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Proposed new issue: spec talks about delivery assurances butdoes not clearly relate them to the protocol
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 26 Sep 2005 17:39:47 -0000
Proposed new issue: spec talks about delivery assurances but does not clearly relate them to the protocol
From
"Stefan Batres" <stefanba@microsoft.com> on 26 Sep 2005 17:07:06 -0000
Action S9 from last week's meeting
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 26 Sep 2005 13:50:22 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Prelim Thu AM F2f minutes
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 25 Sep 2005 15:04:13 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Prelim Thu AM F2f minutes
From
"Bob Freund" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 25 Sep 2005 12:25:11 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Prelim Thu AM F2f minutes
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 24 Sep 2005 02:49:56 -0000
REFURBISHED ISSUE: i021
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 23 Sep 2005 23:36:08 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i010 - a proposal
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 23 Sep 2005 22:56:42 -0000
re Prelim Thu PM f2f MInutes
From
"Tom Rutt" <tom@coastin.com> on 22 Sep 2005 23:09:26 -0000
Prelim Thu PM F2f minutes
From
"Tom Rutt" <tom@coastin.com> on 22 Sep 2005 23:07:57 -0000
Prelim Thu AM F2f minutes
From
"Tom Rutt" <tom@coastin.com> on 22 Sep 2005 19:41:11 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Analysis of the interactions between WS-RM and security
From
Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com> on 22 Sep 2005 18:55:29 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue 25 - form of seqAck when RMD has received no message
From
"Jorgen Thelin" <jthelin@microsoft.com> on 22 Sep 2005 18:29:19 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue 25 - form of seqAck when RMD has received no message
From
"Lei Jin" <ljin@bea.com> on 22 Sep 2005 17:54:54 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue i002 thoughts/proposal
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 22 Sep 2005 16:09:01 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue 25 - form of seqAck when RMD has received no message
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 22 Sep 2005 15:46:16 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue i022, RM Assertions
From
"Bob Freund" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 22 Sep 2005 14:27:02 -0000
Issue 25 - form of seqAck when RMD has received no message
From
"Jorgen Thelin" <jthelin@microsoft.com> on 22 Sep 2005 14:10:04 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue i003 proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 22 Sep 2005 13:56:23 -0000
i010 - a proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 22 Sep 2005 13:45:27 -0000
Implementation SC approach
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 22 Sep 2005 12:31:23 -0000
Issue i003 proposal
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 22 Sep 2005 07:13:54 -0000
Issue i002 thoughts/proposal
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 22 Sep 2005 07:05:39 -0000
Action items from Wed F2f
From
"Tom Rutt" <tom@coastin.com> on 22 Sep 2005 02:11:36 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Which version of WS-Addressing spec?
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 22 Sep 2005 01:44:30 -0000
Proposal to close issue i025
From
"Glen Daniels" <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com> on 22 Sep 2005 00:37:06 -0000
prelim wed PM minuts for f2f
From
"Tom Rutt" <tom@coastin.com> on 22 Sep 2005 00:32:17 -0000
Wednesday AM prelim f2f minutes
From
"Tom Rutt" <tom@coastin.com> on 22 Sep 2005 00:31:24 -0000
Proposal for i024
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 21 Sep 2005 22:53:17 -0000
Take 2 Proposal for issue i009
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 21 Sep 2005 21:31:41 -0000
Proposal for issue i009
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 21 Sep 2005 20:53:23 -0000
New proposed issues 9/15 - 9/20
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 21 Sep 2005 18:58:41 -0000
Groups - New Action Item #0032 Create a proposal for i024
From
paul@wso2.com on 21 Sep 2005 16:10:35 -0000
Groups - New Action Item #0031 Open two issues around cancel / ...
From
paul@wso2.com on 21 Sep 2005 16:09:49 -0000
Groups - New Action Item #0030 Proposal for i003
From
paul@wso2.com on 21 Sep 2005 16:06:18 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Which version of WS-Addressing spec?
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 21 Sep 2005 15:09:25 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Which version of WS-Addressing spec?
From
"Green, Alastair J." <Alastair.Green@choreology.com> on 21 Sep 2005 14:28:48 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Which version of WS-Addressing spec?
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 21 Sep 2005 14:18:47 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Presence of NACK and ACK range in the same message
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 21 Sep 2005 13:44:40 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Which version of WS-Addressing spec?
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 21 Sep 2005 13:44:38 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] namespace URI versioning policy
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 21 Sep 2005 13:34:02 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What does 'have a mustUnderstand attribute' mean?
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 21 Sep 2005 13:34:02 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] namespace URI versioning policy
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 21 Sep 2005 13:34:01 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Why is SecureConversation a normative reference?
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 21 Sep 2005 13:33:57 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Reorder spec sections
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 21 Sep 2005 13:23:39 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Which version of WS-Addressing spec?
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 21 Sep 2005 13:20:18 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Reorder spec sections
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 21 Sep 2005 12:24:24 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Reorder spec sections
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 21 Sep 2005 06:31:07 -0000
Groups - ReliableMessagingIssues.xml (ReliableMessagingIssues.xml) uploaded
From
mgoodner@microsoft.com on 21 Sep 2005 05:36:07 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] location of f2f?
From
"Bergersen, Rebecca" <Rebecca.Bergersen@iona.com> on 21 Sep 2005 05:31:51 -0000
Groups - wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf uploaded
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 21 Sep 2005 02:44:44 -0000
Groups - wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-03.sxw uploaded
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 21 Sep 2005 02:43:39 -0000
NEW ISSUE: CloseSequenceResponse and Acks
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 21 Sep 2005 02:08:09 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Reorder spec sections
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 21 Sep 2005 02:08:09 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] namespace URI versioning policy
From
Peter Niblett <peter_niblett@uk.ibm.com> on 20 Sep 2005 22:32:50 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Schema type of wsrm:FaultCode element can be changed fromxs:QName to wsrm:FaultCodes
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Sep 2005 22:08:09 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Why is SecureConversation a normative reference?
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Sep 2005 21:58:45 -0000
NEW ISSUE: SequenceFault element refers to fault code rather thanfault [Subcode]
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Sep 2005 21:50:27 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Why is wsa imported in the WSDL?
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Sep 2005 21:40:24 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Schema does not contain SecurityTokenRereference
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Sep 2005 21:34:49 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Why is wsa imported in the WSDL?
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Sep 2005 21:28:07 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Which version of WS-Addressing spec?
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Sep 2005 20:02:00 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Presence of NACK and ACK range in the same message
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Sep 2005 19:27:24 -0000
Un=RSVP'ing
From
Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com> on 20 Sep 2005 19:19:12 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] namespace URI versioning policy
From
Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com> on 20 Sep 2005 19:17:46 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Change 'optional' and 'required' in section 3 to RFC 2119OPTIONAL and REQUIRED
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Sep 2005 19:13:46 -0000
NEW ISSUE: What does 'have a mustUnderstand attribute' mean?
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Sep 2005 19:07:05 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] namespace URI versioning policy
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 20 Sep 2005 18:10:42 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 20 Sep 2005 18:08:57 -0000
Analysis of the interactions between WS-RM and security
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 20 Sep 2005 17:31:09 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo
From
"Abbie Barbir" <abbieb@nortel.com> on 20 Sep 2005 14:35:29 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo
From
"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> on 20 Sep 2005 14:31:10 -0000
location of f2f?
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 20 Sep 2005 13:56:04 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: WS-Addressing Endpoint redefined in WSRM
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 20 Sep 2005 11:43:14 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: 2396 is obsoleted by 3986
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 20 Sep 2005 11:42:51 -0000
NEW ISSUE: 2396 is obsoleted by 3986
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Sep 2005 08:55:47 -0000
NEW ISSUE: WS-Addressing Endpoint redefined in WSRM
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Sep 2005 08:17:40 -0000
Non-trivial editorial issues
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Sep 2005 08:01:41 -0000
New ed/non-ed issues
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Sep 2005 07:05:48 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] namespace URI versioning policy
From
Robin Cover <robin@oasis-open.org> on 20 Sep 2005 04:09:34 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Duplicate detection of wsrm:CreateSequence messages
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Sep 2005 02:00:24 -0000
namespace URI versioning policy
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 20 Sep 2005 00:33:14 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Spec (wd3) updated
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Sep 2005 00:22:07 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Action Item # 1014
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 19 Sep 2005 23:34:31 -0000
Action Item # 1014
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 19 Sep 2005 23:05:47 -0000
Apologies for the F2F
From
Peter Niblett <peter_niblett@uk.ibm.com> on 19 Sep 2005 22:36:15 -0000
Groups - ws-RX TC Face to Face Meeting modified
From
sanjay.patil@sap.com on 19 Sep 2005 21:17:17 -0000
Groups - ws-RX TC Face to Face Meeting modified
From
sanjay.patil@sap.com on 19 Sep 2005 21:12:22 -0000
Agenda: Sep 21/22 F2F Meeting
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 19 Sep 2005 20:49:57 -0000
Groups - wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-03.sxw (formerly wsrm-1.1-wd-03.sxw) modified
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 19 Sep 2005 19:14:49 -0000
Groups - wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf (formerly wsrm-1.1-wd-03.pdf) modified
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 19 Sep 2005 19:14:25 -0000
RE: i029 Session hijacking addressed by STR in CSR
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 19 Sep 2005 18:44:29 -0000
Spec (wd3) updated
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 19 Sep 2005 17:17:55 -0000
Groups - wsrm-1.1-wd-03.pdf uploaded
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 19 Sep 2005 17:07:23 -0000
Groups - wsrm-1.1-wd-03.sxw uploaded
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 19 Sep 2005 17:06:36 -0000
Groups - wsrm-1.1-wd-03.pdf (formerly WS-RM-v1[1].0-wd-03.pdf) modified
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 19 Sep 2005 17:05:42 -0000
Groups - wsrm-1.1-wd-03.sxw (formerly WS-RM-v1[1].0-wd-03.sxw) modified
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 19 Sep 2005 17:05:11 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New working draft
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 19 Sep 2005 16:46:45 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New working draft
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 19 Sep 2005 16:32:21 -0000
Groups - wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-01.pdf (wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-01.pdf) uploaded
From
umit.yalcinalp@sap.com on 19 Sep 2005 03:03:38 -0000
Groups - wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-01.sxw (wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-01.sxw) uploaded
From
umit.yalcinalp@sap.com on 19 Sep 2005 03:02:10 -0000
Groups - WS-ReliableMessagingPolicy-1.0draft-01.pdf (WS-ReliableMessagingPolicy-1.0draft-01.pdf) uploaded
From
umit.yalcinalp@sap.com on 19 Sep 2005 02:14:19 -0000
Groups - WS-ReliableMessagingPolicy-1.0draft-01.sxw (WS-ReliableMessagingPolicy-1.0draft-01.sxw) uploaded
From
umit.yalcinalp@sap.com on 19 Sep 2005 02:11:41 -0000
New working draft
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 18 Sep 2005 22:14:10 -0000
Groups - WS-RM-v1[1].0-wd-03.pdf (formerly WS-ReliableMessaging-v1[1].0-wd-03.pdf) modified
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 18 Sep 2005 22:04:56 -0000
Groups - WS-RM-v1[1].0-wd-03.sxw (formerly WS-ReliableMessaging-v1[1].0-wd-03.sxw) modified
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 18 Sep 2005 22:04:27 -0000
Groups - WS-ReliableMessaging-v1[1].0-wd-03.sxw uploaded
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 18 Sep 2005 22:02:24 -0000
Groups - WS-ReliableMessaging-v1[1].0-wd-03.pdf uploaded
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 18 Sep 2005 22:01:48 -0000
i029 Session hijacking addressed by STR in CSR
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 17 Sep 2005 00:59:58 -0000
Regrets for f2f and yesterday's call
From
"David A. Chappell" <chappell@sonicsoftware.com> on 16 Sep 2005 14:42:54 -0000
Preliminary minutes of the Sep 15th meeting
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 16 Sep 2005 09:20:04 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New proposal for i019 and i1028
From
"Stefan Batres" <stefanba@microsoft.com> on 15 Sep 2005 19:58:12 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] a meta-comment
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 15 Sep 2005 19:50:58 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] a meta-comment
From
"Stefan Batres" <stefanba@microsoft.com> on 15 Sep 2005 19:48:57 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue i024
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 15 Sep 2005 19:44:09 -0000
a meta-comment
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 15 Sep 2005 19:23:31 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue i024
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 15 Sep 2005 19:21:53 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New proposal for i019 and i1028
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 15 Sep 2005 18:59:35 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] discussion of issue i009 and 1024
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 15 Sep 2005 17:41:04 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue i024
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 15 Sep 2005 16:40:20 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] discussion of issue i009
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 15 Sep 2005 15:50:58 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] discussion of issue i009
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 15 Sep 2005 15:20:41 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] discussion of issue i009
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 15 Sep 2005 13:12:09 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] discussion of issue i009
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 15 Sep 2005 13:00:12 -0000
RE: Ballot "Attendance at Redmond F2F on Sep 21/22" has closed
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 15 Sep 2005 13:00:00 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue i024
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 15 Sep 2005 12:54:33 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue i024
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 15 Sep 2005 12:40:02 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] New proposal for i019 and i1028
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 15 Sep 2005 07:41:50 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue i024
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 15 Sep 2005 06:27:19 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Proposal for issue 27
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 15 Sep 2005 06:05:30 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] discussion of issue i009
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 15 Sep 2005 05:20:40 -0000
Groups - Web Services Reliable Exchange Use Cases (WS-RX_Use_Cases.doc) uploaded
From
gilbert.pilz@bea.com on 15 Sep 2005 05:14:26 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue i024
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 15 Sep 2005 02:15:20 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New proposal for i019 and i1028
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 15 Sep 2005 01:56:25 -0000
Seattle F2F agenda plans
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 15 Sep 2005 00:00:41 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New proposal for i019 and i1028
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 14 Sep 2005 23:53:13 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New proposal for i019 and i1028
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 14 Sep 2005 21:52:14 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue i024
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 14 Sep 2005 21:48:28 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New proposal for i019 and i1028
From
"Stefan Batres" <stefanba@microsoft.com> on 14 Sep 2005 21:06:34 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New proposal for i019 and i1028
From
"Stefan Batres" <stefanba@microsoft.com> on 14 Sep 2005 20:02:34 -0000
Issue i024
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 14 Sep 2005 19:43:59 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New proposal for i019 and i1028
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 14 Sep 2005 19:07:08 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
sanjay.patil@sap.com on 14 Sep 2005 18:51:23 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Some issues have no proposal so far ...
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 14 Sep 2005 18:15:34 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposal for issue 27
From
Andreas Bjärlestam (HF/EAB) <andreas.bjarlestam@ericsson.com> on 14 Sep 2005 17:57:01 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Formal proposal issue i025
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 14 Sep 2005 16:44:02 -0000
discussion of issue i009
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 14 Sep 2005 16:41:28 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Formal proposal issue i025
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 14 Sep 2005 15:43:26 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Formal proposal issue i025
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 14 Sep 2005 15:34:21 -0000
Formal proposal for issue i020
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 14 Sep 2005 15:30:19 -0000
Formal proposal issue i025
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 14 Sep 2005 14:49:48 -0000
Formal proposal for issue i031
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 14 Sep 2005 14:29:39 -0000
Minutes this week
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 14 Sep 2005 13:56:35 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] New proposal for i019 and i1028
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 14 Sep 2005 13:55:40 -0000
regrets
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 14 Sep 2005 12:38:41 -0000
Groups - Minutes wSRX TC Teleconf 9/8/05 (Minutes-wsrx-090805.htm) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 14 Sep 2005 12:36:18 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] New proposal for i019 and i1028
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 14 Sep 2005 09:12:29 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New proposal for i019 and i1028
From
"Stefan Batres" <stefanba@microsoft.com> on 14 Sep 2005 01:59:22 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New proposal for i019 and i1028
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 14 Sep 2005 01:00:09 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Some issues have no proposal so far ...
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 13 Sep 2005 22:22:57 -0000
New proposal for i019 and i1028
From
"Stefan Batres" <stefanba@microsoft.com> on 13 Sep 2005 19:51:56 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Proposal for issue 27
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 12 Sep 2005 20:53:09 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 12 Sep 2005 18:57:37 -0000
Some issues have no proposal so far ...
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 12 Sep 2005 17:49:13 -0000
Proposal - issues for discussion on the 9/15 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 12 Sep 2005 17:37:36 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 12 Sep 2005 05:20:11 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 12 Sep 2005 04:59:25 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 10 Sep 2005 23:49:04 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 10 Sep 2005 23:31:47 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 10 Sep 2005 10:01:50 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 10 Sep 2005 00:57:27 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 10 Sep 2005 00:07:52 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 9 Sep 2005 23:24:15 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 9 Sep 2005 22:47:54 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 9 Sep 2005 22:23:02 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 9 Sep 2005 20:58:15 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 9 Sep 2005 20:42:19 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 9 Sep 2005 18:42:47 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposal for issue 27
From
Andreas Bjärlestam (HF/EAB) <andreas.bjarlestam@ericsson.com> on 9 Sep 2005 15:17:48 -0000
prelim minutes with wrap on 8.2 and 8.3
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 9 Sep 2005 15:05:45 -0000
NEW ISSUE: What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 9 Sep 2005 06:20:36 -0000
Re: WARNING-XML-CODEBASE-OBJECT-[ws-rx] Preliminary Minutes of TCTeleconf 9/8/05
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 8 Sep 2005 23:33:33 -0000
Preliminary Minutes of TC Teleconf 9/8/05
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 8 Sep 2005 21:52:23 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposal for issue 27
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 8 Sep 2005 21:51:45 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Use case discussion
From
"Abbie Barbir" <abbieb@nortel.com> on 8 Sep 2005 20:03:35 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Use case discussion
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 8 Sep 2005 20:00:24 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i019/i028 - final proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 Sep 2005 20:00:08 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposal for issue 27
From
Andreas Bjärlestam (HF/EAB) <andreas.bjarlestam@ericsson.com> on 8 Sep 2005 19:57:46 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Use case discussion
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 8 Sep 2005 19:49:19 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i019/i028 - final proposal
From
"Bergersen, Rebecca" <Rebecca.Bergersen@iona.com> on 8 Sep 2005 19:39:23 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Use case discussion
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Sep 2005 19:30:39 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i019 - Proposal #5
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 Sep 2005 18:58:40 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Proposal for i012
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 8 Sep 2005 18:51:28 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 8 Sep 2005 18:15:05 -0000
i019/i028 - final proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 Sep 2005 18:03:31 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposal for issue 27
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 8 Sep 2005 17:56:26 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
paul@wso2.com on 8 Sep 2005 17:47:28 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i019 - Proposal #5
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 8 Sep 2005 17:43:07 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Agenda for 8 Sep 2005 call
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Sep 2005 17:35:34 -0000
WS-RX Implementation SubCommittee
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 8 Sep 2005 15:34:46 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposal for issue 27
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 8 Sep 2005 14:48:28 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 8 Sep 2005 13:48:11 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 8 Sep 2005 13:22:15 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i019 - Proposal #5
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 Sep 2005 13:19:40 -0000
Proposal for issue 27
From
Andreas Bjärlestam (HF/EAB) <andreas.bjarlestam@ericsson.com> on 8 Sep 2005 09:47:49 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Use case discussion
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 8 Sep 2005 08:28:15 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 7 Sep 2005 23:59:07 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
"Stefan Batres" <stefanba@microsoft.com> on 7 Sep 2005 23:40:36 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i0019 - proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 7 Sep 2005 23:36:04 -0000
Groups - Issues notes (2005-Sep-07-ws-rx-Issues process.txt) uploaded
From
mgoodner@microsoft.com on 7 Sep 2005 23:29:37 -0000
New proposed issues 9/1 - 9/7
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 7 Sep 2005 23:05:50 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Use case discussion
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 7 Sep 2005 20:11:13 -0000
Groups - ReliableMessagingIssues.xml (ReliableMessagingIssues.xml) uploaded
From
mgoodner@microsoft.com on 7 Sep 2005 18:09:26 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE - No indication of how to process NACKs in normal case
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 7 Sep 2005 18:05:35 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE - No indication of how to process NACKs innormal case
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 7 Sep 2005 17:55:33 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE - No indication of how to process NACKs innormal case
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 7 Sep 2005 17:46:55 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE - No indication of how to process NACKs in normalcase
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 7 Sep 2005 16:45:13 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE - No indication of how to process NACKs in normal case
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 7 Sep 2005 16:28:20 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE - No indication of how to process NACKs in normalcase
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 7 Sep 2005 16:24:52 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 7 Sep 2005 16:18:03 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE - No indication of how to process NACKs in normal case
From
"Winkler, Steve" <steve.winkler@sap.com> on 7 Sep 2005 16:09:55 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 7 Sep 2005 15:22:39 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Fault handling of piggy-backed Acks
From
Daniel Millwood <MILLWOOD@uk.ibm.com> on 7 Sep 2005 13:56:13 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE - No indication of how to process NACKs in normalcase
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 7 Sep 2005 13:37:16 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 7 Sep 2005 12:51:17 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 4
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 7 Sep 2005 04:04:09 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i019 - Proposal #5
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 7 Sep 2005 01:25:08 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 4
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 7 Sep 2005 00:46:27 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposal for i012
From
"Lei Jin" <ljin@bea.com> on 6 Sep 2005 20:51:09 -0000
NEW ISSUE - No indication of how to process NACKs in normal case
From
"Winkler, Steve" <steve.winkler@sap.com> on 6 Sep 2005 18:55:33 -0000
Issue i005
From
"Winkler, Steve" <steve.winkler@sap.com> on 6 Sep 2005 18:55:27 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 4
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 6 Sep 2005 18:47:04 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
"Stefan Batres" <stefanba@microsoft.com> on 6 Sep 2005 17:15:23 -0000
Groups - Minutes WSRX TC Teleconf 9/1/2005 (Minutes-wsrx-090105.htm) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 6 Sep 2005 17:01:57 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 6 Sep 2005 00:16:40 -0000
i019 - Proposal #5
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 6 Sep 2005 00:04:54 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
"Stefan Batres" <stefanba@microsoft.com> on 5 Sep 2005 23:35:32 -0000
Agenda for 8 Sep 2005 call
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 5 Sep 2005 19:56:00 -0000
Implementation SC
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 5 Sep 2005 16:51:27 -0000
Use case discussion
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 5 Sep 2005 16:03:39 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 4
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 2 Sep 2005 23:18:27 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Prelim Minutes of sep 01 wsrx teleconference
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 1 Sep 2005 21:53:48 -0000
Prelim Minutes of sep 01 wsrx teleconference
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 1 Sep 2005 21:42:54 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New proposed issues 8/25 - 8/31
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 1 Sep 2005 19:57:48 -0000
Regrets for today's meeting
From
Charlton Barreto <cbarreto@adobe.com> on 1 Sep 2005 19:55:09 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Proposal for i012
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 1 Sep 2005 19:44:34 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 4
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 1 Sep 2005 19:41:32 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] RE: Proposal for i029 "Remove dependency on WS-Security"
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 1 Sep 2005 19:14:07 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on the 9/1 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 1 Sep 2005 19:00:55 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 4
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 1 Sep 2005 18:48:34 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Proposal for i004
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 1 Sep 2005 18:40:23 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
"Stefan Batres" <stefanba@microsoft.com> on 1 Sep 2005 17:41:51 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 4
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 1 Sep 2005 17:34:34 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposal for i004
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 1 Sep 2005 16:06:18 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 4
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 1 Sep 2005 15:44:22 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 1 Sep 2005 15:43:41 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 1 Sep 2005 14:51:10 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
"Giovanni Boschi" <gboschi@sonicsoftware.com> on 1 Sep 2005 13:46:00 -0000
[ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 4
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 1 Sep 2005 13:41:35 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 1 Sep 2005 13:40:48 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 1 Sep 2005 13:37:13 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 1 Sep 2005 12:48:02 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 1 Sep 2005 12:21:30 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] RE: Proposal for i029 "Remove dependency on WS-Security"
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 1 Sep 2005 07:04:36 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 1 Sep 2005 06:45:14 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New proposed issues 8/25 - 8/31
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 1 Sep 2005 06:01:45 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] RE: Proposal for i029 "Remove dependency on WS-Security"
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 1 Sep 2005 06:00:08 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New proposed issues 8/25 - 8/31
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 1 Sep 2005 05:44:09 -0000
RE: Proposal for i029 "Remove dependency on WS-Security"
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 1 Sep 2005 05:34:11 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i0019 - a formal proposal - take 2
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 1 Sep 2005 05:12:17 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Inconsistency between spec and schema (AckRequested)
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 1 Sep 2005 04:28:04 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2