OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
wsbpel
138 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 305 proposal for discussion
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 31 Jul 2006 09:12:21 -0000
Groups - Issue-305-wsbpel-specification-draft_AYIU.doc uploaded
From
alex.yiu@oracle.com on 31 Jul 2006 08:51:13 -0000
Agenda for Aug 2 TC meeting
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 31 Jul 2006 02:44:00 -0000
Issue 305 proposal for discussion
From
"Mark Ford" <mark.ford@active-endpoints.com> on 31 Jul 2006 00:07:51 -0000
Groups - Isse 305 edits for queryLanguage (Issue-305-wsbpel-specification-draft.doc) uploaded
From
mark.ford@active-endpoints.com on 30 Jul 2006 23:39:55 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 305
From
"Mark Ford" <mark.ford@active-endpoints.com> on 29 Jul 2006 12:50:50 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 305
From
Thomas Schulze <ThomasSchulze@de.ibm.com> on 29 Jul 2006 08:30:07 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 29 Jul 2006 01:14:05 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion (matchinglogic)
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 28 Jul 2006 22:21:54 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion
From
"Mark Ford" <mark.ford@active-endpoints.com> on 28 Jul 2006 18:48:17 -0000
Groups - New Action Item #0138 replace NCName with BPELVariable...
From
mark.ford@active-endpoints.com on 28 Jul 2006 16:47:00 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion (matching logic)
From
"Assaf Arkin" <arkin@intalio.com> on 28 Jul 2006 16:04:19 -0000
htm version of candidate committee draft
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 28 Jul 2006 13:41:41 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion (matchinglogic)
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 28 Jul 2006 13:35:25 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion
From
"Mark Ford" <mark.ford@active-endpoints.com> on 28 Jul 2006 13:07:49 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion (matching logic)
From
"Mark Ford" <mark.ford@active-endpoints.com> on 28 Jul 2006 12:55:40 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 28 Jul 2006 05:48:06 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 28 Jul 2006 04:18:54 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion (matchinglogic)
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 28 Jul 2006 04:17:23 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion (matchinglogic)
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 28 Jul 2006 02:25:46 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 28 Jul 2006 02:17:40 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion (matchinglogic)
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 28 Jul 2006 01:27:08 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion
From
"Mark Ford" <mark.ford@active-endpoints.com> on 28 Jul 2006 00:59:21 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 28 Jul 2006 00:07:51 -0000
Groups - WS-BPEL 2.0 Candidate Committee Draft July 27, 2006 (HTML version with change mark-up) (wsbpel-specification-draft-July27-2006-MU.htm) uploaded
From
pyendluri@webmethods.com on 27 Jul 2006 22:54:29 -0000
Groups - WS-BPEL 2.0 Candidate Committee Draft July 27, 2006 (HTML version with No change mark-up) (wsbpel-specification-draft-July27-2006.htm) uploaded
From
pyendluri@webmethods.com on 27 Jul 2006 22:53:21 -0000
Groups - Variable Access In Comp Handler (VarAccessCH.png) (formerly image006.png) modified
From
pyendluri@webmethods.com on 27 Jul 2006 22:00:09 -0000
candidate committee draft for review
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 27 Jul 2006 21:57:13 -0000
Groups - idate Committee Draft July 27, 2006 (no mark-up) (wsbpel-specification-draft-July27-2006.pdf) uploaded
From
pyendluri@webmethods.com on 27 Jul 2006 20:56:53 -0000
Groups - WS-BPEL 2.0 Candidate Committee Draft July 27, 2006 (with mark-up) (wsbpel-specification-draft-July27-2006-MU.pdf) uploaded
From
pyendluri@webmethods.com on 27 Jul 2006 20:53:59 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion
From
"Mark Ford" <mark.ford@active-endpoints.com> on 27 Jul 2006 17:43:51 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 305
From
"Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM> on 27 Jul 2006 16:59:41 -0000
Issue 305
From
"Mark Ford" <mark.ford@active-endpoints.com> on 27 Jul 2006 16:18:30 -0000
Groups - wsbpel-specification-draft revision 1.165.doc (wsbpel-specification-draft revision 1.165.doc) uploaded
From
dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com on 27 Jul 2006 12:09:25 -0000
Groups - wsbpel-specification-draft revision 1.164.doc (wsbpel-specification-draft revision 1.164.doc) uploaded
From
dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com on 27 Jul 2006 12:08:02 -0000
Groups - Action Item Closed: #0071 Consistent use of fromPart/toPar...
From
dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com on 27 Jul 2006 07:40:19 -0000
Groups - TC Conf Call modified
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 26 Jul 2006 20:52:17 -0000
Groups - TC Conf Call modified
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 26 Jul 2006 20:51:04 -0000
Groups - BPEL TC Conference call modified
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 26 Jul 2006 20:49:29 -0000
Groups - BPEL TC Conference call modified
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 26 Jul 2006 20:45:29 -0000
issue 247 - additional changes for the static analysis table
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 26 Jul 2006 17:39:07 -0000
issue 291 - final resolution
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 26 Jul 2006 17:32:55 -0000
Groups - Action Item Closed: #0136 Section 10.4 - Providing Web Ser...
From
dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com on 26 Jul 2006 17:21:40 -0000
Groups - New Action Item #0136 Section 10.4 - Providing Web Ser...
From
dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com on 26 Jul 2006 17:18:36 -0000
Groups - New Action Item #0135 Add a 2nd "MUST be" to line 821 ...
From
mark.ford@active-endpoints.com on 26 Jul 2006 17:00:57 -0000
[wsbpel] Issue 303 resolution
From
"Mark Ford" <mark.ford@active-endpoints.com> on 26 Jul 2006 16:46:32 -0000
Groups - proposed resolution for issue 304 (Issue 304.doc) uploaded
From
dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com on 26 Jul 2006 16:28:57 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whether theQName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operat ions
From
Dieter Koenig1 <dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com> on 26 Jul 2006 15:22:14 -0000
Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 26 Jul 2006 07:41:38 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whetherthe QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operat ions
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 25 Jul 2006 21:23:43 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whetherthe QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operat ions
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 25 Jul 2006 20:01:27 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whether theQName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operat ions
From
Dieter Koenig1 <dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com> on 25 Jul 2006 18:32:57 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whetherthe QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operat ions
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 25 Jul 2006 00:17:22 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whetherthe QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 25 Jul 2006 00:09:10 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whetherthe QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operat ions
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 24 Jul 2006 23:57:35 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whetherthe QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 24 Jul 2006 23:41:53 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whetherthe QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 24 Jul 2006 23:28:34 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whether the QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
"Assaf Arkin" <arkin@intalio.com> on 24 Jul 2006 23:06:21 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whetherthe QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 24 Jul 2006 22:52:25 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whether the QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
"Assaf Arkin" <arkin@intalio.com> on 24 Jul 2006 22:30:45 -0000
Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whether the QName ofa fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 24 Jul 2006 21:45:30 -0000
Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whether the QName of afault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 24 Jul 2006 20:11:09 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of afault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 24 Jul 2006 15:42:33 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 24 Jul 2006 14:58:37 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Thomas Schulze <ThomasSchulze@de.ibm.com> on 24 Jul 2006 14:40:00 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 24 Jul 2006 14:32:54 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of afault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 24 Jul 2006 14:14:24 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Thomas Schulze <ThomasSchulze@de.ibm.com> on 24 Jul 2006 14:09:52 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of afault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 24 Jul 2006 13:54:02 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Thomas Schulze <ThomasSchulze@de.ibm.com> on 24 Jul 2006 13:17:43 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of afault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 24 Jul 2006 11:45:23 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Thomas Schulze <ThomasSchulze@de.ibm.com> on 24 Jul 2006 09:27:32 -0000
Agenda for July 26 TC meeting
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 24 Jul 2006 02:14:24 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of afault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 21 Jul 2006 23:32:31 -0000
Groups - Current WS-BPEL Issues List (WS_BPEL_issues_list.html) uploaded
From
peter.furniss@erebor.co.uk on 21 Jul 2006 22:50:24 -0000
Issue - 305 - Remove query language in favor of expression language for <to>
From
ws-bpel issues list editor <peter.furniss@erebor.co.uk> on 21 Jul 2006 22:47:10 -0000
Issue - 304 - clarification on whether the QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
ws-bpel issues list editor <peter.furniss@erebor.co.uk> on 21 Jul 2006 22:47:09 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 21 Jul 2006 21:00:10 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of afault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 21 Jul 2006 20:32:27 -0000
subscriptions to the BPEL TC public comment list
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 21 Jul 2006 17:59:28 -0000
New Issue - Remove query language in favor of expression language for <to>
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 21 Jul 2006 16:37:13 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Thomas Schulze <ThomasSchulze@de.ibm.com> on 21 Jul 2006 09:45:04 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of afault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 21 Jul 2006 00:05:31 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Initial example violates SA00049?
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 20 Jul 2006 23:50:57 -0000
new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a fault needs tobe unique across all portTypes and operations
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 20 Jul 2006 22:53:02 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Initial example violates SA00049?
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 20 Jul 2006 22:22:32 -0000
issue 247 - folllow up questions on static analysis table
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 20 Jul 2006 22:15:01 -0000
issue 291 - proposal to vote
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 20 Jul 2006 21:57:18 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Initial example violates SA00049?
From
Thomas Schulze <ThomasSchulze@de.ibm.com> on 20 Jul 2006 21:44:46 -0000
Groups - Action Item Closed: #0052 Put "Each business process MUST ...
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 20 Jul 2006 15:29:05 -0000
Groups - Action Item Closed: #0037 Consider moving section 4 somewh...
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 20 Jul 2006 15:28:42 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Initial example violates SA00050?
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 19 Jul 2006 17:26:41 -0000
Proposed action item: Bug in Initial example - violates SA00050
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 19 Jul 2006 17:17:13 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 294.2 - proposal for vote
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 19 Jul 2006 16:55:41 -0000
Action Item 52 can be closed.
From
"Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM> on 19 Jul 2006 16:37:09 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] spec editing status - volunteers needed!
From
Dieter Koenig1 <dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com> on 19 Jul 2006 15:39:41 -0000
Proposed schedule
From
"John Evdemon" <John.Evdemon@microsoft.com> on 19 Jul 2006 15:24:03 -0000
Action Item 37 is no longer applicable and should be marked closed.
From
Rania Khalaf <rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com> on 19 Jul 2006 14:31:58 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] spec editing status - volunteers needed!
From
Rania Khalaf <rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com> on 19 Jul 2006 14:25:03 -0000
Fw: Initial example violates SA00050?
From
Thomas Schulze <ThomasSchulze@de.ibm.com> on 19 Jul 2006 11:30:37 -0000
spec editing status - volunteers needed!
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 18 Jul 2006 20:38:44 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 17 Jul 2006 23:56:40 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 17 Jul 2006 21:55:09 -0000
Initial example violates SA00050?
From
Thomas Schulze <ThomasSchulze@de.ibm.com> on 17 Jul 2006 09:10:45 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 15 Jul 2006 20:50:53 -0000
Groups - TC Conf Call modified
From
John.Evdemon@microsoft.com on 14 Jul 2006 01:25:11 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Proposal: "code freeze"
From
"John Evdemon" <John.Evdemon@microsoft.com> on 13 Jul 2006 20:56:59 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 13 Jul 2006 20:47:07 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 13 Jul 2006 17:20:07 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 13 Jul 2006 16:44:40 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Proposal: "code freeze"
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 13 Jul 2006 15:27:49 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 13 Jul 2006 03:07:59 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 13 Jul 2006 02:24:53 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 13 Jul 2006 02:24:07 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 13 Jul 2006 01:41:52 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 13 Jul 2006 01:37:57 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 303 proposed resolution
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 13 Jul 2006 01:04:13 -0000
Issue 291 - Proposal for vote
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 13 Jul 2006 00:31:39 -0000
Groups - TC Conf Call modified
From
John.Evdemon@microsoft.com on 12 Jul 2006 19:37:38 -0000
Groups - TC Conf Call modified
From
John.Evdemon@microsoft.com on 12 Jul 2006 19:22:36 -0000
Groups - 2006-07-12 WS-BPEL Minutes (2006-07-12 WS-BPEL Minutes.html) uploaded
From
John.Evdemon@microsoft.com on 12 Jul 2006 19:12:44 -0000
Proposal: "code freeze"
From
"John Evdemon" <John.Evdemon@microsoft.com> on 12 Jul 2006 18:11:52 -0000
Issue 303 proposed resolution
From
"Mark Ford" <mark.ford@active-endpoints.com> on 12 Jul 2006 17:46:04 -0000
Quick summary of 7/12 conference call
From
"John Evdemon" <John.Evdemon@microsoft.com> on 12 Jul 2006 17:40:15 -0000
Groups - New Action Item #0134 Add voted on resolution of 302 t...
From
rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com on 12 Jul 2006 17:04:10 -0000
Groups - Action Item Modified: #0133 edit in the 82.3 lost section AN...
From
rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com on 12 Jul 2006 17:00:47 -0000
Groups - Action Item Modified: #0133 edit in the 82.3 lost section AN...
From
rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com on 12 Jul 2006 16:59:51 -0000
Groups - New Action Item #0133 edit in the 82.3 lost section AN...
From
rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com on 12 Jul 2006 16:58:48 -0000
Groups - New Action Item #0132 edit in the 82.3 lost section AN...
From
rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com on 12 Jul 2006 16:58:21 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 302 - Amended Voted on proposal, approved onJuly 12.
From
Rania Khalaf <rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com> on 12 Jul 2006 16:54:27 -0000
Agenda for 7/12!
From
"John Evdemon" <John.Evdemon@microsoft.com> on 12 Jul 2006 12:53:14 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] onEvent inconsistency between spec & schema?
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 11 Jul 2006 19:48:16 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] onEvent inconsistency between spec & schema?
From
"Mark Ford" <mark.ford@active-endpoints.com> on 11 Jul 2006 17:53:39 -0000
onEvent inconsistency between spec & schema?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 11 Jul 2006 13:49:38 -0000
Returned mail: Data format error
From
scott.mcgrath@oasis-open.org on 9 Jul 2006 09:45:16 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Section 10.4 - Reply
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 6 Jul 2006 18:47:07 -0000
Section 10.4 - Reply
From
Dieter Koenig1 <dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com> on 6 Jul 2006 16:49:37 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 247 - Applied
From
"Mehta, Vinkesh \(US - Austin\)" <vmehta@DELOITTE.com> on 4 Jul 2006 17:30:13 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2