OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
sca-j
232 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 1] Accessing SCA Services from non-SCA component code -Formal Proposal update
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 31 Mar 2009 15:23:42 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 1] Accessing SCA Services from non-SCA componentcode - Formal Proposal update
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 31 Mar 2009 12:35:00 -0000
ISSUE 153: Java CI should have corresponding changes in JAVA-125 - proposal
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 31 Mar 2009 11:58:24 -0000
ISSUE 152: Java C&I should have had corresponding changes in JAVA-134 -proposal
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 31 Mar 2009 11:58:08 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 1] Accessing SCA Services from non-SCA component code -Another update
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 31 Mar 2009 10:00:12 -0000
Groups - Java CAA - Issue 1 Proposal revision - PDF (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3 Issue1 rev 4.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 31 Mar 2009 09:59:03 -0000
Groups - Java CAA - Issue 1 Proposal revision - Word (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3 Issue1 rev 4.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 31 Mar 2009 09:58:02 -0000
JAVA-1: Sample code for alternative factory lookup approach
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 30 Mar 2009 18:33:44 -0000
ISSUE-154: Incorrect use of ##any in Java Schemas
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 30 Mar 2009 18:03:20 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Incorrect use of ##any in Java Schemas
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 30 Mar 2009 17:53:12 -0000
Raw minutes from today's call
From
Graham Charters <CHARTERS@uk.ibm.com> on 30 Mar 2009 16:34:52 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 1] Accessing SCA Services from non-SCA component code -Formal Proposal update
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 30 Mar 2009 12:52:56 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 1] Accessing SCA Services from non-SCA componentcode - Formal Proposal update
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 30 Mar 2009 11:53:05 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 29 Mar 2009 19:54:11 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-03-27 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-03-27.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 29 Mar 2009 19:47:52 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD06 (pdf) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd06.pdf) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 27 Mar 2009 17:30:58 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD06 (doc) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd06.doc) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 27 Mar 2009 17:30:05 -0000
[sca-j] Java TC March 27th minutes(raw)
From
Yang Lei <yanglei@us.ibm.com> on 27 Mar 2009 16:08:13 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf cancelled
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 27 Mar 2009 14:16:19 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon cancelled
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 27 Mar 2009 14:15:36 -0000
JAVA-98: Summary of current status and proposed direction for resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 27 Mar 2009 13:07:09 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 27 Mar 2009 12:34:29 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-129: Proposed resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 27 Mar 2009 11:11:00 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 26 Mar 2009 14:28:11 -0000
New Java CAA Working Draft - CD02 Rev4
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 26 Mar 2009 13:49:51 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Java CI should have corresponding changes in JAVA-125 - [JAVA-153]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 26 Mar 2009 13:27:45 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Java C&I should have had corresponding changes in JAVA-134 - [JAVA-152]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 26 Mar 2009 13:21:58 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Java CI should have corresponding changes in JAVA-125
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 26 Mar 2009 13:11:15 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Java C&I should have had corresponding changes in JAVA-134
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 26 Mar 2009 13:09:11 -0000
New Java CI working draft 05
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 26 Mar 2009 13:09:11 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD05 (doc) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd05.doc) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 26 Mar 2009 13:01:13 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD05 (PDF) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd05.pdf) uploaded
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 26 Mar 2009 13:00:07 -0000
ISSUE-151: JAVA-77 should have been resolved against Java CI spec
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 25 Mar 2009 19:26:21 -0000
Groups - SCA Java CAA Spec CD02 Rev4 - PDF (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev4.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 25 Mar 2009 12:12:38 -0000
Groups - SCA Java CAA Spec CD02 Rev4 - Word (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev4.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 25 Mar 2009 12:08:38 -0000
NEW ISSUE: JAVA-77 should have been resolved against Java CI spec
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 24 Mar 2009 23:23:44 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-03-23 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-03-23.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 24 Mar 2009 15:56:26 -0000
Only one instance of a Modifier type per Element...
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 23 Mar 2009 20:52:50 -0000
ISSUE-150: SCA Spring C & I specification need to mention how SCA runtimeshould load multiple application context files.
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 23 Mar 2009 19:54:23 -0000
[sca-j] NEW ISSUE: SCA Spring C & I specification need to mention how SCAruntime should load multiple application context files.
From
Ramkumar R1 <ramkumar_rj@in.ibm.com> on 23 Mar 2009 19:04:33 -0000
Raw log of 2009-03-23 telcon
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 23 Mar 2009 16:03:04 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: SCA Spring C & I specification need to specify the limitations of implicit references - [JAVA-149]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 23 Mar 2009 14:28:47 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 23 Mar 2009 14:09:29 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 23 Mar 2009 13:59:34 -0000
Completed Action Items
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 23 Mar 2009 13:55:54 -0000
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards
From
workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org on 23 Mar 2009 13:24:57 -0000
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards
From
workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org on 23 Mar 2009 13:22:36 -0000
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards
From
workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org on 23 Mar 2009 13:10:37 -0000
[sca-j] NEW ISSUE: SCA Spring C & I specification need to specify thelimitations of implicit references
From
Ramkumar R1 <ramkumar_rj@in.ibm.com> on 23 Mar 2009 12:30:19 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Issue 119: YAAP version 3 - comments
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 23 Mar 2009 12:27:05 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Two ways to specific the same intent
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 23 Mar 2009 11:43:15 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 23 Mar 2009 11:32:04 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Java CAA missing full definition of annotations applying to Java Interfaces - [JAVA-148]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 23 Mar 2009 11:32:00 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] <implementation.java/> - Missing schema and missing definitions in normative section - [JAVA-147]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 23 Mar 2009 11:30:48 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD04 PDF (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 23 Mar 2009 11:21:09 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD04 Word (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 23 Mar 2009 11:20:28 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Java CAA missing full definition of annotations applying toJava Interfaces
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 23 Mar 2009 11:07:11 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] <implementation.java/> - Missing schema and missing definitionsin normative section
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 23 Mar 2009 10:24:10 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD04 PDF (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 23 Mar 2009 09:34:08 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD04 Word (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 23 Mar 2009 09:32:13 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Issue 119: YAAP version 3 - comments
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 23 Mar 2009 09:23:58 -0000
Two ways to specific the same intent
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 23 Mar 2009 08:09:43 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 22 Mar 2009 20:21:41 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-03-20 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-03-20.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 22 Mar 2009 20:17:32 -0000
Issue 119: YAAP version 3
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Mar 2009 20:39:25 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Issue 119: YAAP version 2
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Mar 2009 20:35:42 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Issue 119: YAAP version 2
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 20 Mar 2009 20:03:43 -0000
ISSUE-146: JCI spec section 9 (<implementation.java>) does not have any2119 keywords
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 20 Mar 2009 19:38:39 -0000
NEW ISSUE: JCI spec section 9 (<implementation.java>) does not haveany 2119 keywords
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Mar 2009 19:13:24 -0000
Issue 119: YAAP version 2
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Mar 2009 19:02:24 -0000
Raw minutes for today's call
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 20 Mar 2009 16:07:25 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 1] Accessing SCA Services from non-SCA component code -Formal Proposal update
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 20 Mar 2009 14:56:31 -0000
Groups - Java CAA - Issue 1 Proposal revision - PDF (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3 Issue1 rev 3.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 20 Mar 2009 14:55:07 -0000
Groups - Java CAA - Issue 1 Proposal revision - Word (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3 Issue1 rev 3.doc) modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 20 Mar 2009 14:54:08 -0000
Groups - Java CAA - Issue 1 Proposal revision 2 - Word (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3 Issue1 rev 3.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 20 Mar 2009 14:53:40 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD04 PDF (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 20 Mar 2009 14:25:36 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD04 Word (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 20 Mar 2009 14:24:41 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 1] Accessing SCA Services from non-SCA componentcode - Formal Proposal
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 20 Mar 2009 09:58:54 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 20 Mar 2009 09:32:43 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Constructor selection algorithm is not well defined - [JAVA-145]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 20 Mar 2009 09:19:36 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Possible confusion over whether @Service can specify both a class and an interface - [JAVA-144]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 20 Mar 2009 09:18:05 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-98: Proposed direction for resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 20 Mar 2009 09:14:55 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Issue 119: YAAP
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 20 Mar 2009 08:41:52 -0000
Issue 119: YAAP
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Mar 2009 07:21:16 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Constructor selection algorithm is not well defined
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 19 Mar 2009 20:30:24 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Possible confusion over whether @Service can specify botha class and an interface
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 19 Mar 2009 20:00:56 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [ISSUE 1] Accessing SCA Services from non-SCA component code -Formal Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 19 Mar 2009 15:32:08 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Updated code proposal
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 19 Mar 2009 15:09:21 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 19 Mar 2009 15:05:30 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [ISSUE 1] Accessing SCA Services from non-SCA component code - Formal Proposal
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 19 Mar 2009 15:01:23 -0000
Groups - Java CAA - Issue 1 Proposal revision 2 - PDF (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3 Issue1 rev 2.pdf) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 19 Mar 2009 14:57:43 -0000
Groups - Java CAA - Issue 1 Proposal revision 2 - Word (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3 Issue1 rev 2.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 19 Mar 2009 14:57:02 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 1] Accessing SCA Services from non-SCA component code -Formal Proposal
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 18 Mar 2009 17:20:44 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 1] Accessing SCA Services from non-SCA component code -Formal Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 18 Mar 2009 14:16:28 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 1] Accessing SCA Services from non-SCA component code -Formal Proposal
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 18 Mar 2009 13:46:09 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Java C&I Constrctor Examples are incorrect
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 18 Mar 2009 11:46:01 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 105] RFC2119 Language is needed for C&I Specification -updated draft
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 18 Mar 2009 11:28:45 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 105] RFC2119 Language is needed for C&I Specification -final updated draft
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 18 Mar 2009 10:15:19 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD04 proposal (PDF) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04_proposal4.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 18 Mar 2009 10:14:15 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD04 proposal (Word) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04_proposal4.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 18 Mar 2009 10:12:06 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 105] RFC2119 Language is needed for C&I Specification -updated draft
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 18 Mar 2009 10:02:01 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 105] RFC2119 Language is needed for C&I Specification -updated draft
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 18 Mar 2009 02:40:12 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 105] RFC2119 Language is needed for C&I Specification- updated draft
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 17 Mar 2009 22:47:38 -0000
[ISSUE 105] RFC2119 Language is needed for C&I Specification - updateddraft
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 17 Mar 2009 21:45:40 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD04 proposal (PDF) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04_proposal3.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 17 Mar 2009 21:42:46 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD04 proposal (Word) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04_proposal3.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 17 Mar 2009 21:41:49 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Java C&I Constrctor Examples are incorrect
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 17 Mar 2009 20:46:38 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-03-17 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-03-17.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 17 Mar 2009 16:24:16 -0000
Raw chat log from March 17 SCA-J call
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 17 Mar 2009 16:13:16 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Java C&I Constrctor Examples are incorrect
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 17 Mar 2009 14:33:20 -0000
[ISSUE 1] Accessing SCA Services from non-SCA component code - FormalProposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 17 Mar 2009 14:18:53 -0000
Groups - Java CAA - Issue 1 Proposal - PDF (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3+Issue1.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 17 Mar 2009 14:16:03 -0000
Groups - Java CAA - Issue 1 Proposal - Word (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3+Issue1.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 17 Mar 2009 14:14:47 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Guidelines for dealing with cyclic references refersto an impossible situation
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 17 Mar 2009 13:36:12 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Special Telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 17 Mar 2009 13:12:39 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components - Updated proposal revision 4
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 17 Mar 2009 13:11:50 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-129: Proposed resolution
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 17 Mar 2009 12:53:02 -0000
Groups - SCA Java CAA Spec CD03 Rev3 - PDF (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3.pdf) modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 17 Mar 2009 12:45:36 -0000
Groups - SCA Java CAA Spec CD02 Rev3 - Word (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 17 Mar 2009 12:44:47 -0000
Groups - SCA Java CAA Specification CD03 - PDF (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 17 Mar 2009 12:42:05 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Special Telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 17 Mar 2009 12:26:46 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components - Updated proposal revision 6
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 17 Mar 2009 12:21:29 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components -Updated proposal revision 4
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 17 Mar 2009 11:05:07 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Java C&I Constrctor Examples are incorrect
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 17 Mar 2009 10:42:21 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components- Updated proposal revision 5
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 17 Mar 2009 10:39:44 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Guidelines for dealing with cyclic references refers to an impossible situation
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 17 Mar 2009 10:35:35 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 105] RFC2119 Language is needed for C&I Specification- responses to comments and updated draft
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 17 Mar 2009 10:29:29 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Can a reference used with constructor be optional?
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 17 Mar 2009 10:28:16 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Java C&I Constrctor Examples are incorrect
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 17 Mar 2009 10:28:11 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components - Updated proposal revision 4
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 17 Mar 2009 10:26:52 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Guidelines for dealing with cyclic references refers to animpossible situation
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 17 Mar 2009 10:26:06 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components - Updated proposal revision 5
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 17 Mar 2009 10:17:36 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components -Updated proposal revision 4
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 17 Mar 2009 10:12:25 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Java C&I Constrctor Examples are incorrect
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 17 Mar 2009 10:08:29 -0000
JAVA-129: Proposed resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 17 Mar 2009 09:48:17 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Java C&I Constrctor Examples are incorrect
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 17 Mar 2009 09:40:32 -0000
[ISSUE 105] RFC2119 Language is needed for C&I Specification - responses tocomments and updated draft
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 17 Mar 2009 09:11:58 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD04 proposal (PDF) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04_proposal2.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 17 Mar 2009 09:07:43 -0000
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD04 proposal (Word) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04_proposal2.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 17 Mar 2009 09:06:15 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components -Updated proposal revision 4
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 17 Mar 2009 04:28:24 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Special Telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 17 Mar 2009 02:45:02 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components - Updated proposal revision 4
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 16 Mar 2009 22:14:56 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-03-16 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-03-16.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 16 Mar 2009 20:07:31 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 104] RFC2119 Language is needed for CAA Specification- Proposal
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 16 Mar 2009 14:32:09 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 16 Mar 2009 14:21:51 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components- Updated proposal revision 3
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 16 Mar 2009 14:16:30 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 104] RFC2119 Language is needed for CAA Specification -Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 16 Mar 2009 14:11:57 -0000
Groups - Java CAA CD02 Rev3 Proposal Word format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3_proposal3.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 16 Mar 2009 14:11:15 -0000
Groups - Java CAA CD02 Rev3 Proposal Word format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3_proposal.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 16 Mar 2009 14:09:53 -0000
Groups - Java CAA CD02 Rev3 Proposal PDF format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3_proposal3.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 16 Mar 2009 14:07:34 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components -Updated proposal revision 3
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 16 Mar 2009 13:19:41 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components- Updated proposal revision 2
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 16 Mar 2009 12:40:58 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Updated code proposal
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 16 Mar 2009 12:39:07 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Updated code proposal
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 16 Mar 2009 12:16:38 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 16 Mar 2009 08:44:15 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 15 Mar 2009 22:06:07 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components - Updated proposal revision 3
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 15 Mar 2009 21:29:51 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components - Updated proposal revision 2
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 15 Mar 2009 21:24:14 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Updated code proposal
From
Raymond Feng <rfeng@us.ibm.com> on 15 Mar 2009 05:33:21 -0000
Testing and CS votes - thoughts from the OpenCSA Steering Committee
From
Jeff Mischkinsky <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com> on 13 Mar 2009 21:26:41 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Handling the remaining open issues and our first Public Review - Updated plan
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 13 Mar 2009 16:12:33 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-03-13 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-03-13.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 13 Mar 2009 15:44:45 -0000
ISSUE 123: Java C&I - Remove references to conversational function -proposal
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 13 Mar 2009 15:21:34 -0000
[sca-j] Java TC March 13th minutes(raw)
From
Yang Lei <yanglei@us.ibm.com> on 13 Mar 2009 15:19:03 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 13 Mar 2009 14:34:09 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 13 Mar 2009 14:32:30 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 13 Mar 2009 14:27:19 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Handling the remaining open issues and our first PublicReview
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 13 Mar 2009 13:35:38 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 13 Mar 2009 13:14:06 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Updated code proposal
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 13 Mar 2009 13:07:03 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components- Updated proposal revision 2
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 13 Mar 2009 12:54:13 -0000
Handling the remaining open issues and our first Public Review
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 13 Mar 2009 12:46:32 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-98: Proposed direction for resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 13 Mar 2009 12:13:46 -0000
RE: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Updated code proposal
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 13 Mar 2009 12:09:16 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback and @Remotable on implementationclasses - [JAVA-134]
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 13 Mar 2009 12:00:26 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-98: Proposed direction for resolution
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 13 Mar 2009 11:44:11 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: MAY clauses in JCA90029 and JCA90033 - [JAVA-142]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 13 Mar 2009 11:02:35 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Signature of ComponentContext.cast() method - [JAVA-141]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 13 Mar 2009 11:00:13 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Schema for @ejb-link-name is incorrect - [JAVA-140]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 13 Mar 2009 10:59:06 -0000
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback and @Remotable on implementationclasses - [JAVA-134]
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 13 Mar 2009 10:55:22 -0000
Re: [sca-j] FW: Copyright and license headers
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 13 Mar 2009 10:37:22 -0000
NEW ISSUE: MAY clauses in JCA90029 and JCA90033
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 13 Mar 2009 10:32:34 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Signature of ComponentContext.cast() method
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 13 Mar 2009 10:19:52 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 104] RFC2119 Language is needed for CAA Specification- Proposal
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 13 Mar 2009 10:05:01 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Schema for @ejb-link-name is incorrect
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 12 Mar 2009 17:24:17 -0000
FW: Copyright and license headers
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 12 Mar 2009 16:35:25 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 12 Mar 2009 15:22:50 -0000
[ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components - Updated proposal revision 2
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 12 Mar 2009 13:50:57 -0000
[JAVA-1] Updated code proposal
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 12 Mar 2009 13:10:36 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 78: Need API to set EPR and for a reference invocation -Defer
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 12 Mar 2009 12:07:41 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 78: Need API to set EPR and for a reference invocation- Defer
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 12 Mar 2009 09:34:47 -0000
ISSUE 78: Need API to set EPR and for a reference invocation - Defer
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 11 Mar 2009 17:06:08 -0000
Current Open Issue status
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 11 Mar 2009 15:06:20 -0000
Re: [sca-j] New Call slot opening up - Please respond
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 11 Mar 2009 12:49:13 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-125: proposed resolution (updated to consider Assembly-109)
From
Graham Charters <CHARTERS@uk.ibm.com> on 11 Mar 2009 12:25:57 -0000
ATTENTION: New telecon added for Mar 17, 10:30EDT-NoonEDT
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 10 Mar 2009 20:00:34 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Special Telecon added
From
booz@us.ibm.com on 10 Mar 2009 19:51:01 -0000
Re: [sca-j] New Call slot opening up - Please respond
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 10 Mar 2009 17:10:24 -0000
Re: [sca-j] New Call slot opening up - Please respond
From
ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 10 Mar 2009 16:17:46 -0000
New Call slot opening up - Please respond
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 10 Mar 2009 16:11:16 -0000
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-125: proposed resolution (updated to consider Assembly-109)
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 10 Mar 2009 09:00:05 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-03-09 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-03-09.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 9 Mar 2009 16:18:40 -0000
Today's minutes
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 9 Mar 2009 15:55:52 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Java C&I Constrctor Examples are incorrect- [JAVA-137]
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 9 Mar 2009 14:20:39 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Java C&I Constrctor Examples are incorrect
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 9 Mar 2009 14:14:28 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 9 Mar 2009 12:58:27 -0000
JAVA-125: proposed resolution (updated to consider Assembly-109)
From
Graham Charters <CHARTERS@uk.ibm.com> on 8 Mar 2009 23:57:18 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 8 Mar 2009 21:28:46 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: default value for SCA property is not supported for java implementations - [JAVA-139]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 6 Mar 2009 16:23:41 -0000
[sca-j]JAVA-98: Proposed direction for resolution -- comments
From
Yang Lei <yanglei@us.ibm.com> on 6 Mar 2009 16:21:38 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-03-06 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-03-06.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 6 Mar 2009 16:14:45 -0000
XSDs for Main SCA Namespace - Updated Namespace
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 5 Mar 2009 22:18:47 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Groups - SCA Java C&I WD04 proposal (PDF) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04_proposal.pdf)uploaded
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 5 Mar 2009 20:34:13 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 5 Mar 2009 16:15:29 -0000
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Restriction on JAXWS Holders is cumbersome - [JAVA-138]
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 5 Mar 2009 16:14:38 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Restriction on JAXWS Holders is cumbersome
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 5 Mar 2009 15:23:21 -0000
ISSUE-2: Determining the data binding to use (e.g. JAXB or SDO) - proposal
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 4 Mar 2009 20:25:13 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-03-02 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-03-02.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 4 Mar 2009 10:20:32 -0000
Raw chat log of 2009-03-02 telcon
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 2 Mar 2009 17:05:09 -0000
[sca-j] [ISSUE 104] RFC2119 Language is needed for CAA Specification -Updated Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 2 Mar 2009 15:20:11 -0000
Groups - Java CAA CD02 Rev3 Proposal PDF format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3_proposal2.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 2 Mar 2009 15:17:27 -0000
Groups - Java CAA CD02 Rev3 Proposal Word format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3_proposal2.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 2 Mar 2009 15:16:36 -0000
Groups - Java CAA CD02 Rev3 Proposal PDF format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3_proposal2.pdf) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 2 Mar 2009 14:50:34 -0000
Groups - Java CAA CD02 Rev3 Proposal Word format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3_proposal2.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 2 Mar 2009 14:47:46 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 104] RFC2119 Language is needed for CAA Specification -Proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 2 Mar 2009 14:43:43 -0000
NEW ISSUE: default value for SCA property is not supported for javaimplementations
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 2 Mar 2009 13:57:45 -0000
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon added
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 2 Mar 2009 13:38:19 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Constructor selected for implementation instance creation
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 2 Mar 2009 09:38:29 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 104] RFC2119 Language is needed for CAA Specification- Proposal
From
Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> on 2 Mar 2009 00:02:34 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 1 Mar 2009 20:16:42 -0000
DST changes in the US on March 8
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 1 Mar 2009 20:13:01 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-27 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-27.doc) uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 1 Mar 2009 19:43:08 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2