OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
wsbpel
182 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 30 Apr 2004 00:45:40 -0000
issue resolutions
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 29 Apr 2004 16:38:20 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Are WSDL descriptions always required for abstract processes
From
"Rossomando, Philip" <Philip.Rossomando@unisys.com> on 29 Apr 2004 14:34:07 -0000
RE: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 1 - Permeability of scopes
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 29 Apr 2004 04:43:30 -0000
[wsbpel] Are WSDL descriptions always required for abstract processes
From
"Tony Fletcher" <tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com> on 29 Apr 2004 01:19:20 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 28 Apr 2004 23:59:27 -0000
Issue - 75 - Local partnerlinks and deployment
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 28 Apr 2004 23:09:51 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 1 - Permeability of scopes
From
GORAN.OLSSON@ORACLE.COM on 28 Apr 2004 22:19:37 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 90 - Proposal to vote
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 28 Apr 2004 21:49:38 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Are WSDL descriptions always required for abstract processes
From
"Liu, Kevin" <kevin.liu@sap.com> on 28 Apr 2004 16:02:43 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 37 - F2F Presentation Draft
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 28 Apr 2004 15:45:13 -0000
[no subject]
From
Unknown on Wed Apr 28 10:59:36 2004
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 90 - Proposal to vote
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 28 Apr 2004 14:59:21 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 90 - Proposal to vote
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 28 Apr 2004 14:58:04 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 90 - Proposal to vote
From
"Kristofer Agren" <kagren@pakalert.com> on 28 Apr 2004 13:08:57 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 37 - F2F Presentation Draft
From
Yuzo Fujishima <fujishima@bc.jp.nec.com> on 28 Apr 2004 08:01:22 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 37 - F2F Presentation Draft
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 28 Apr 2004 04:04:03 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 33 - proposal to vote for telco, reworded
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 28 Apr 2004 03:38:58 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 103 - draft proposal going to land soon
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 28 Apr 2004 02:38:45 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 33 - proposal to vote for telco, reworded
From
"Liu, Kevin" <kevin.liu@sap.com> on 27 Apr 2004 20:48:23 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 121 - <finally> construct
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 27 Apr 2004 19:17:49 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 121 - <finally> construct
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 27 Apr 2004 18:35:15 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 121 - <finally> construct
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 27 Apr 2004 17:59:42 -0000
[no subject]
From
Unknown on Tue Apr 27 12:59:34 2004
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 90 - Proposal to vote
From
Dieter Koenig1 <dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com> on 27 Apr 2004 16:29:34 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 90 - Proposal to vote
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 27 Apr 2004 14:57:52 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 90 - Proposal to vote
From
"Kristofer Agren" <kagren@pakalert.com> on 27 Apr 2004 13:51:30 -0000
Are WSDL descriptions always required for abstract processes
From
"Tony Fletcher" <tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com> on 27 Apr 2004 13:47:21 -0000
Groups - wsbpel_issues_list.html uploaded
From
peter.furniss@choreology.com on 27 Apr 2004 12:07:33 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 121 - <finally> construct
From
Dieter Koenig1 <dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com> on 27 Apr 2004 06:26:29 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 90 - Proposal to vote
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 26 Apr 2004 22:51:42 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 26 Apr 2004 22:19:12 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 26 Apr 2004 22:15:28 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 90 - Proposal to vote
From
"Kristofer Agren" <kagren@pakalert.com> on 26 Apr 2004 19:56:22 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 90 - Proposal to vote
From
"Kristofer Agren" <kagren@pakalert.com> on 26 Apr 2004 19:53:07 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 90 - Proposal to vote
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 26 Apr 2004 19:07:33 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 90 - Proposal to vote
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 26 Apr 2004 18:32:47 -0000
Reminder - voting on 4 ballots for BPEL
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 26 Apr 2004 15:17:24 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 90 - Proposal to vote
From
Dieter Koenig1 <dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com> on 26 Apr 2004 13:06:22 -0000
Agenda for April 28 TC call
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 25 Apr 2004 21:48:53 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
"Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM> on 23 Apr 2004 21:25:01 -0000
Groups - wsbpel_plinkType-April-23-2004.xsd uploaded
From
alex.yiu@oracle.com on 23 Apr 2004 19:17:28 -0000
Groups - wsbpel_msgprop-April-23-2004.xsd uploaded
From
alex.yiu@oracle.com on 23 Apr 2004 19:17:04 -0000
Groups - wsbpel_main-April-23-2004.xsd uploaded
From
alex.yiu@oracle.com on 23 Apr 2004 19:16:47 -0000
Groups - wsbpel-specification-draft-April-23-2004.html uploaded
From
pyendluri@webmethods.com on 23 Apr 2004 18:53:11 -0000
Issue - 90 - Proposal to vote
From
"Kristofer Agren" <kagren@pakalert.com> on 23 Apr 2004 02:34:06 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 22 Apr 2004 23:59:01 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 22 Apr 2004 23:38:02 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 22 Apr 2004 23:24:47 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 22 Apr 2004 23:00:32 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 22 Apr 2004 22:41:57 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 94 - Proposal to vote
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 22 Apr 2004 21:56:37 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
Maciej Szefler <mbs@fivesight.com> on 22 Apr 2004 17:35:22 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 22 Apr 2004 16:51:08 -0000
participation in web ballots and membership status
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 22 Apr 2004 16:24:18 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 22 Apr 2004 15:59:09 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 22 Apr 2004 15:42:50 -0000
Groups - Minutes 04142004.htm uploaded
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 22 Apr 2004 15:13:58 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 22 Apr 2004 14:15:37 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 22 Apr 2004 14:15:36 -0000
Issue 117 - Proposal for Vote
From
Yuzo Fujishima <fujishima@bc.jp.nec.com> on 22 Apr 2004 11:29:14 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 22 Apr 2004 00:26:44 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 21 Apr 2004 20:33:53 -0000
Groups - 2004-04-20-Meeting-Minutes.pdf uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 21 Apr 2004 18:39:48 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG / Schematron
From
Scott Hinkelman <srh@us.ibm.com> on 21 Apr 2004 18:20:19 -0000
Groups - WS BPEL TC Face to Face meeting modified
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 21 Apr 2004 18:14:41 -0000
Groups - WS BPEL TC Face to Face meeting modified
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 21 Apr 2004 18:12:55 -0000
Groups - WS BPEL TC Face to Face meeting modified
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 21 Apr 2004 18:10:48 -0000
Groups - 2004-04-01-Ivana-Presentation.pdf uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 21 Apr 2004 18:05:24 -0000
Groups - 2004-03-31-04-01-F2F-Minutes.pdf uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 21 Apr 2004 18:04:41 -0000
Groups - 2004-03-31-04-01-F2F-Minutes.doc uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 21 Apr 2004 18:03:16 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 21 Apr 2004 17:02:04 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG
From
Maciej Szefler <mbs@fivesight.com> on 21 Apr 2004 16:52:49 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 20 Apr 2004 22:44:43 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 20 Apr 2004 21:28:49 -0000
Groups - OrderShipping.wsdl uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 20 Apr 2004 19:58:46 -0000
Groups - OrderShippingProcess.bpel uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 20 Apr 2004 19:53:27 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: [wsbpel-uc] Groups - Rescheduled Conf Call added
From
"Rossomando, Philip" <Philip.Rossomando@unisys.com> on 20 Apr 2004 19:49:04 -0000
Groups - WSBPEL-Use-Cases-Overview.html uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 20 Apr 2004 19:38:03 -0000
Groups - MS-02.rtf uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 20 Apr 2004 19:31:03 -0000
RE: Multiple <process> elements
From
"Rossomando, Philip" <Philip.Rossomando@unisys.com> on 20 Apr 2004 15:03:33 -0000
Groups - Issues coordination call added
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 20 Apr 2004 14:41:47 -0000
Issue - 122 - Clearify wording for Message Exchange Patterns
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 20 Apr 2004 13:02:50 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 20 Apr 2004 12:46:21 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 20 Apr 2004 10:49:27 -0000
Issue - 121 - <finally> construct
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 20 Apr 2004 08:56:56 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG
From
Dieter Roller <ROL@de.ibm.com> on 20 Apr 2004 05:14:35 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 20 Apr 2004 03:01:22 -0000
[no subject]
From
Unknown on Mon Apr 19 22:59:27 2004
Re: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 20 Apr 2004 02:56:16 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 20 Apr 2004 01:56:11 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 20 Apr 2004 01:55:21 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 20 Apr 2004 01:55:21 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 20 Apr 2004 01:55:15 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
Yuzo Fujishima <fujishima@bc.jp.nec.com> on 20 Apr 2004 01:36:19 -0000
New issue - <finally> ?
From
"Glenn Mi" <gmi@collaxa.com> on 19 Apr 2004 23:40:00 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
Maciej Szefler <mbs@fivesight.com> on 19 Apr 2004 22:43:10 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG
From
Maciej Szefler <mbs@fivesight.com> on 19 Apr 2004 22:34:29 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 19 Apr 2004 21:53:03 -0000
Issue - 120 - What are the semantics when an initial <receive> has no correlation set?
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 19 Apr 2004 21:15:09 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 19 Apr 2004 20:33:47 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 19 Apr 2004 20:21:11 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG
From
"Anderson Jonathan" <anderson_jonathan@bah.com> on 19 Apr 2004 20:17:35 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 19 Apr 2004 19:21:32 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG
From
Maciej Szefler <mbs@fivesight.com> on 19 Apr 2004 19:15:03 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 19 Apr 2004 18:34:10 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG
From
"Anderson Jonathan" <anderson_jonathan@bah.com> on 19 Apr 2004 17:35:38 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 19 Apr 2004 17:31:20 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG
From
Maciej Szefler <mbs@fivesight.com> on 19 Apr 2004 17:26:18 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
Maciej Szefler <mbs@fivesight.com> on 19 Apr 2004 17:16:14 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 19 Apr 2004 17:12:03 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 19 Apr 2004 17:07:23 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 19 Apr 2004 17:02:34 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG
From
Frank Leymann <LEY1@de.ibm.com> on 19 Apr 2004 15:11:23 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG
From
"Anderson Jonathan" <anderson_jonathan@bah.com> on 19 Apr 2004 14:17:50 -0000
Issue - 119 - Transition Conditions and Invoke Fault Handlers
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 19 Apr 2004 08:35:26 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
Yuzo Fujishima <fujishima@bc.jp.nec.com> on 19 Apr 2004 01:36:17 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 17 Apr 2004 03:49:49 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 17 Apr 2004 03:39:47 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
"Tony Fletcher" <tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com> on 17 Apr 2004 02:10:25 -0000
FYI: BPELJ interview
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 17 Apr 2004 01:33:23 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 17 Apr 2004 00:52:21 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 16 Apr 2004 23:27:48 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 16 Apr 2004 22:52:33 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 16 Apr 2004 22:40:06 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 16 Apr 2004 22:24:26 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 16 Apr 2004 21:19:29 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 16 Apr 2004 21:10:15 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 16 Apr 2004 21:03:55 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 16 Apr 2004 20:59:06 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 16 Apr 2004 20:49:07 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
Maciej Szefler <mbs@fivesight.com> on 16 Apr 2004 18:39:23 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 16 Apr 2004 17:36:20 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
Yuzo Fujishima <fujishima@bc.jp.nec.com> on 16 Apr 2004 02:21:56 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 16 Apr 2004 02:21:19 -0000
Groups - WS BPEL TC conference call modified
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 15 Apr 2004 19:43:26 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 15 Apr 2004 19:01:09 -0000
Issue - 118 - When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 15 Apr 2004 17:41:21 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
"Rossomando, Philip" <Philip.Rossomando@unisys.com> on 15 Apr 2004 12:47:59 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
Yuzo Fujishima <fujishima@bc.jp.nec.com> on 15 Apr 2004 02:56:25 -0000
Issue - 107 - Extension points and opacity
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 14 Apr 2004 23:48:33 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] RE: [wsbpel-uc] Groups - Rescheduled Conf Call added
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 14 Apr 2004 21:15:04 -0000
Using RelaxNG
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 14 Apr 2004 20:47:36 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 33 - proposal to vote for telco, reworded
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 14 Apr 2004 18:22:16 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 33 - proposal to vote for telco, reworded
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 14 Apr 2004 17:46:10 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - For Each?
From
Dieter Roller <ROL@de.ibm.com> on 14 Apr 2004 17:16:28 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - For Each?
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 14 Apr 2004 16:37:33 -0000
RE: [wsbpel-uc] Groups - Rescheduled Conf Call added
From
"Rossomando, Philip" <Philip.Rossomando@unisys.com> on 14 Apr 2004 16:23:57 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - For Each?
From
Dieter Roller <ROL@de.ibm.com> on 14 Apr 2004 15:35:27 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - For Each?
From
"Trickovic, Ivana" <ivana.trickovic@sap.com> on 14 Apr 2004 15:14:02 -0000
Issue - 117 - Link Name Scoping
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 14 Apr 2004 09:33:18 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: Link Name Scoping
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 13 Apr 2004 16:57:40 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - For Each?
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 13 Apr 2004 16:56:13 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - For Each?
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 13 Apr 2004 16:30:23 -0000
[no subject]
From
Unknown on Tue Apr 13 11:59:40 2004
Groups - WS BPEL TC conference call added
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 13 Apr 2004 15:44:21 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - For Each?
From
Dieter Koenig1 <dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com> on 13 Apr 2004 15:41:00 -0000
Groups - issue34-mm2-040104.pdf uploaded
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 13 Apr 2004 15:40:02 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: Link Name Scoping
From
rkhalaf <rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com> on 13 Apr 2004 13:34:54 -0000
Fw: Agenda for April 14 TC call - update
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 13 Apr 2004 03:26:47 -0000
Q: Link Name Scoping
From
Yuzo Fujishima <fujishima@bc.jp.nec.com> on 13 Apr 2004 02:28:04 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - For Each?
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 12 Apr 2004 19:47:50 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - For Each?
From
"Kristofer Agren" <kagren@pakalert.com> on 12 Apr 2004 18:19:26 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - For Each?
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 12 Apr 2004 17:40:22 -0000
Agenda for April 14 TC call
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 12 Apr 2004 13:21:54 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - For Each?
From
"Kristofer Agren" <kagren@pakalert.com> on 9 Apr 2004 21:34:54 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - For Each?
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 9 Apr 2004 21:20:09 -0000
Issue - 9 - Entries for consideration
From
"Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 9 Apr 2004 21:17:56 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 103 - WSDL 1.1 schema
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 9 Apr 2004 11:24:28 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 94 - Proposal to vote
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 8 Apr 2004 18:46:13 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 94 - Proposal to vote
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 8 Apr 2004 16:40:15 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 94 - Proposal to vote
From
Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com> on 8 Apr 2004 04:34:22 -0000
Groups - 2004-04-06-Meeting-Minutes.pdf uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 7 Apr 2004 08:16:03 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] BPELJ
From
"Rossomando, Philip" <Philip.Rossomando@unisys.com> on 6 Apr 2004 16:48:32 -0000
Issue - 116 - <process> element should be optional
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 1 Apr 2004 12:02:51 -0000
Issue - 115 - Revise content of Appendix C
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 1 Apr 2004 10:19:36 -0000
presentation on issue 4 from Ivana
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 1 Apr 2004 08:39:06 -0000
Updated Issue 34 Brief - Minor changes after Issue 4 Discussion Today
From
"Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM> on 1 Apr 2004 08:32:18 -0000
Use Cases - feedback requested
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 1 Apr 2004 08:30:03 -0000
Groups - Liaison2BPEL 20040331.ppt uploaded
From
martin.chapman@oracle.com on 1 Apr 2004 07:44:58 -0000
Groups - WS BPEL TC Face to Face meeting modified
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 1 Apr 2004 05:59:12 -0000
updated agenda for Apr. 1 and action items from Mar. 31
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 1 Apr 2004 05:55:46 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2