OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

amqp-ms message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [amqp-ms] ROP Change discussion Period

Hi Abbie,


BofA is not currently represented in the AMQP MS SC. However, BofA is represented in the AMQP TC.




From: Barbir, Abbie [mailto:abbie.barbir@bankofamerica.com]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 1:21 PM
To: John O'Hara; Ram Jeyaraman (MS OPEN TECH)
Cc: Scott McGrath; AMQP Member Section
Subject: RE: [amqp-ms] ROP Change discussion Period



I do agree with John here

By the way do we have anyone from BofA on the SC




From: amqp-ms@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:amqp-ms@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of John O'Hara
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 4:18 PM
To: Ram Jeyaraman (MS OPEN TECH)
Cc: Scott McGrath; AMQP Member Section
Subject: Re: [amqp-ms] ROP Change discussion Period


I would concur - we need to assure that we can get business done.


Looking back to the AMQP Working Group we had "steering group" of 6 firms, and getting quorum of 4 could occasionally be tricky even when there were many more people on the meeting.


This issue is exacerbated because we need the *right* person from a firm - given these leaders are usually in demand by their own businesses this can lead to challenges.


So I support Ram.



On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Ram Jeyaraman (MS OPEN TECH) <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com> wrote:

Her are my comments on the revised RoP [2]:

1.       Given the persistent problems we have had with the Steering Committee (SC) meetings reaching quorum, I strongly suggest reducing the size of the SC to 7 or 9 maximum. The size of 11 suggested in the revised RoP is likely NOT going to address the severe lack of attendance problems this SC is currently facing.

2.       Section 7 contains the phrase “As part of approving Committee Specification or Committee Note version of their deliverables”. There has been some confusion about what it actually means from the point of view of implementing it. I suggest rephrasing it as follows: “Prior to approving Committee Specification or Committee Note version of their deliverables.”.




-----Original Message-----
From: amqp-ms@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:amqp-ms@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Scott McGrath
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 11:03 AM
To: AMQP Member Section
Subject: [amqp-ms] ROP Change discussion Period




Three members of your Member Section have requested a revision of the Rules of Procedure which govern activities in your Member Section. [1]  The ROP, with red-line changes is published for your review. [2]


The process for making such a change is described in Section 3.3 of the Member Section Policy [3] and provides a 30 day discussion period for you to discuss this proposal before we ask for your vote.


Please take advantage of this discussion period so you may be an informed voter in the upcoming special Majority ballot which will require 2/3 of all qualified electors to vote "yes" in order that this change is accepted.


Please send your comments to this AMQP Member Section mail list [4],


thanks for your involvement,




[1]  https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/amqp-ms/email/archives/201206/msg00010.html

[2]  https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/amqp-sc/download.php/46275/Member%20Section%20Rules%20of%20Procedure%20v1.2.pdf

[3]  https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/member-sections

[4]  amqp-ms@lists.oasis-open.org


Scott McGrath





Tel +1 781-425-5073 x202

Fax +1 781-425-5072


Follow OASIS on:


LinkedIn:    http://linkd.in/OASISopen


Twitter:        http://twitter.com/OASISopen


Facebook:  http://facebook.com/oasis.open



To unsubscribe, e-mail: amqp-ms-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org

For additional commands, e-mail: amqp-ms-help@lists.oasis-open.org






This message w/attachments (message) is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies and attachments, and be advised that any review or dissemination of, or the taking of any action in reliance on, the information contained in or attached to this message is prohibited.
Unless specifically indicated, this message is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any investment products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Sender. Subject to applicable law, Sender may intercept, monitor, review and retain e-communications (EC) traveling through its networks/systems and may produce any such EC to regulators, law enforcement, in litigation and as required by law.
The laws of the country of each sender/recipient may impact the handling of EC, and EC may be archived, supervised and produced in countries other than the country in which you are located. This message cannot be guaranteed to be secure or free of errors or viruses.

References to "Sender" are references to any subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation. Securities and Insurance Products: * Are Not FDIC Insured * Are Not Bank Guaranteed * May Lose Value * Are Not a Bank Deposit * Are Not a Condition to Any Banking Service or Activity * Are Not Insured by Any Federal Government Agency. Attachments that are part of this EC may have additional important disclosures and disclaimers, which you should read. This message is subject to terms available at the following link:
http://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with Sender you consent to the foregoing.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]