[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Created: (AMQP-28) Confused use of the terms two's-complement" and "signed"
Confused use of the terms two's-complement" and "signed" -------------------------------------------------------- Key: AMQP-28 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/AMQP-28 Project: OASIS Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) TC Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: David Ingham Assignee: Rafael Schloming From Steve Huston's review: Part 1, sect 2.1: "two's-complement" and "signed" seem to be used interchangeably but they're not equivalent. Using both terms leaves open the question of why, and casts doubt about what "signed" means (does it mean 1's-complement?) Recommend specifying signed integer types as "signed" and specify in the last sentence of section 2 (before section 2.1) that signed integer values are transmitted using two's-complement representation, in network byte order. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]