[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (AMQP-85) [Global Addressing] 4.6 Address Equivalence : container specific domains
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/AMQP-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Godfrey updated AMQP-85: ---------------------------- Description: "Containers participating in non local namespaces that also support legacy addresses MUST recognize the follow- ing forms as equivalent where <domain> represents the name of the container in the non local namespace." What does this mean? In general what relationships are we defining between containers and domains ? In particular are we saying that for every container must support at least one "local" domain where for every address /domain/path you can also address it as simply path. Or are we saying that if a container supports addresses of the form "path" then there must be a single domain D such that /D/path is equivalent to path for all paths? was: "Containers participating in non local namespaces that also support legacy addresses MUST recognize the follow- ing forms as equivalent where <domain> represents the name of the container in the non local namespace." What does this mean? In general what relationships are we defining between containers and domains ? > [Global Addressing] 4.6 Address Equivalence : container specific domains > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: AMQP-85 > URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/AMQP-85 > Project: OASIS Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) TC > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Global Addressing > Affects Versions: WD03 > Reporter: Rob Godfrey > > "Containers participating in non local namespaces that also support legacy addresses MUST recognize the follow- > ing forms as equivalent where <domain> represents the name of the container in the non local namespace." > What does this mean? In general what relationships are we defining between containers and domains ? > In particular are we saying that for every container must support at least one "local" domain where for every address /domain/path you can also address it as simply path. Or are we saying that if a container supports addresses of the form "path" then there must be a single domain D such that /D/path is equivalent to path for all paths? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]