Re: [amqp] Addressing Meeting

Looking at the notes in the linked document, I do think it important not to forget about the Q in AMQP. The core protocol is transfer of responsibility, and is purposefully light on queuing. However some of those use cases work best when the addressed service being communicated with is a queue and the application service is on the other side of that queue, especially when any kind of temporal separation is required between a requesting application and a receiving application.

I agree with Rafi that getting clarity on the interpretation of addressed service by the basis communities that have an interest in AMQP in the different fields it can be applied in is important (convergence rather than orbit, as he says).

I have voiced my industry's need for brokered communications between political entities on many occasions and it remains my view that AMQP needs to support that community well, since that is one of the few use cases not adequately supported by other protocols.

On Apr 1, 2014 9:34 PM, "Rafael Schloming" <rafaels@redhat.com> wrote:

Hi Everyone,

We're going to have an addressing editing session on Friday from 10am to noon (EST).

The goal of this meeting is to have a focused editing session that includes all of the strongly opinionated addressing stakeholders, and hopefully converge towards rather than orbit around consensus.

We will use the dial in for the regular AMQP TC call. If you need the info please contact myself and/or Rob Godfrey directly.

For reference the googledoc with the previous meeting notes can be found here:

- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bSZ2BYMnoFvhdFkEuY_bXpp7GBPrvTza6REPPqAWT3Q/edit?usp=sharing

--Rafael

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

amqp message