[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: WS-Events
It sounds like May 2004 for the specification, June for interoperability demos. We're on a schedule to release a revised draft every 15th of the month. It appears that in the Workflow community service instance state is managed in terms of sets of activities, in the Grid community as an explicit set of service data elements and updates are in effect events, and I suppose traditionally there's an implicit state where messages or operations are implicit events. Both ASAP and OSGI also have the idea of observers subscribing for notifications, in the case of ASAP the state change notifications are sent to the observer, in the case of OGSI an XML subscription expression (for use with XPath?) describes when to notify the observer based on service element (effectively state/substate) changes. I've been sort of swayed that an explicit request for state change may be appropriate for the high level states for ASAP, and it appears that substates of subprocesses for workflow are handled by explicitly addressing the activity states, but I still wonder if explicit events wouldn't be useful for asynchronous service instances, and I think the more perspectives, experiences, and relevant artifacts available to our discussion the better. Anxious to hear everyone's thoughts, John On Dec 29, 2003, at 12:38 PM, Vambenepe, William N wrote: > Hi John, > > Yes, support for events is a major missing piece in the Web services > puzzle. As you may know, this is a need that impacts other working > groups. For example, the WSDM (Web Services Distributed Management) TC > in OASIS (where WS-Events has been submitted by HP as part of WSMF, The > Web Services Management Framework) also has a requirement on the use of > events. It seems clear that both TCs, along with other working groups > would benefit from a common spec for handling Web services events. > > We are doing further work on Web services eventing and it should be > made > public relatively soon. What kind of timeframe is the ASAP TC on? > > Regards, > > William
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]