RE: [asoat-discuss] geti-july30-v1.doc

["Marco Carugi" <marco.carugi@nortel.com>]

Hi Abbie,

 

few comments on the last charter update: 

 

1) bullet 10 in 1a of "scope of the work": what does "investigate the need to extend handling" mean ?  

2) some activities in the management area seem covered already by TMF (e.g. 8 and 9 (and 2 ?) in 1a of "scope of the work"), so, at a minimim, some precisions (or amendments) are required.

3) the reference to IEEE NGSON in (1) (b) is unclear with respect to its current position in the text. I am not sure that reference is critical there.   

4) it should be considered the removal of "ETSI/TISPAN" from the list of SDOs in bullet 2 of "scope of the work" because it is - without a clear rationale - the unique regional organisation mentioned in the text. Unless other regional organisations are considered (e.g. ATIS).

5) the described process concerning the requirements oriented activity is not very clear to me: bullet 3 of "scope of the work" says "... for specifying these requirements" but bullet 2 already covers the development of a requirement document. Clarification is required if these are distinct requirements oriented activity phases. 

6) there is no projected completion date for the "Requirements document" (bullet 3 of (1) (d) list of deliverables).

7) editorial: the first sentence in bullet 2 of "scope of the work" is duplicated.

8) editorial: "SOALT" should be changed into "GETI" in (2) (a) within "non-normative information regarding the startup of the TC".

 

 

Thanks for your consideration. Regards, Marco 

 

 

---

From: Barbir, Abbie (CAR:1A14)
Sent: mercredi 30 juillet 2008 12:20
To: asoat-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org; dee.schur@oasis-open.org; mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
Cc: drsecure@us.ibm.com; Amardeo Sarma; Takashi Egawa; Giordano, Michael (Michael)
Subject: [asoat-discuss] geti-july30-v1.doc

Dee, Mary

If we submit this charter by end of next week, can we still have our first F2F during the OASIS Forum in October???

 

All,

 

I have incorporated all the feed back that I have got so far in a clean version of the charter (Attached).

I have basically refocused the charter to reflect the comments that were received so far.

 

One consequence of this is that now we have a new suggested name for the TC (GETI).

 

I have also updated the IPR section to reflect the feedback that I have got from many possible co-proposes of the TC. The choice of RAND makes the TC capable of interacting with other SDO where Telecom Operators are active without worrying about the consequences of different IPR modes of operation that may prevent them from working with us. Simply said, RAND IPR mode makes our life easier when we deal with ITU-T, OMA, OMG and TM Forum.

 

The out of scope section, states that specific solutions are out of scope. The idea here is solutions will be investigated in appropriate TCs that can be created later in the Telecom MS, in OASIS or in the form of collaboration with other SDOs or other TCs in OASIS.

 

All, please provide feedback on this modified/updated charter ASAP so we can get the ball rolling in the right direction.

 

Regards

Abbie