Re: [egov] BCM and eprXML pilots

["David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>]

John,

It's ticklish!  I'd like to see more user interface components built
in-front of the Registry.

I agree that general users should not directly interface to the registry.

So the notion of a portal - such as the eprXML model - having access to
registry content to drive enduser selections and actions - makes sense.

An XForms API for Registry might not be a bad "extra" here - so people
could rapidly build forms extensions to registry that conform to the RIM.
Just a thought!

DW.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Weiland, John R. NMIMC GS" <JRWeiland@US.MED.NAVY.MIL>
To: "'Farrukh Najmi'" <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>; "Hans A. Aanesen"
<hans@iti.as>
Cc: <bcm@lists.oasis-open.org>; <egov@lists.oasis-open.org>; "Knut
Lindelien" <Knut.Lindelien@nts.no>
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:28 AM
Subject: RE: [egov] BCM and eprXML pilots


> Good Morning,
>
> This seemed to be a recurring theme during our F2F last week.  I
envisioned
> a Registry/Repository a utility for programmer's use, not a broker for end
> users.
>
> r/ John Weiland
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:53 AM
> To: Hans A. Aanesen
> Cc: bcm@lists.oasis-open.org; egov@lists.oasis-open.org; Knut Lindelien
> Subject: Re: [egov] BCM and eprXML pilots
>
>
> Hans A. Aanesen wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you for a very fruitful conference.(Specially our workshop)
> >
> > It is obvious that eprXML will be a very nice "face" for BCM in
> > Governmental organized services in e-Gov SOA. Special interesting is
> > the broader audience in the e-Gov TC and that they need a more
> > governmental and not vendor controlled guidance.
> >
> >
> >
> > One important topic here is the needed "single sign-on" PKI solutions
> > based on a national repository (UDDI?)
> >
> Why do you pre-suppose UDDI here Hans?
>
> Were you aware that UDDI *DOES NOT* provide a repository at all?
>
> I would think that ebXML Registry would be a much better fit for a
> standards-based national registry/repository. It *DOES* provide a
> feature rich repository.
>
> I would be glad to explore this further with the team if needed. Thanks.
>
> -- 
> Farrukh
>
>
> > built upon a _not vendor made_ specification of API Meta-models (Web
> > Services).It is crucial that it must be built upon Governmental terms
> > (as EPR).
> >
> > Such Meta models should be approved by Governments based
> > on recommended certificates from for instance OASIS e-Gov.
> >
> >
> >
> > It would be nice if we could extend our eprXML pilots on a broader
> > international basis!
> >
> > We will also come back on sugestions on international pilots.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Hans A. Aanesen
> >
> > EPR-Forum Norway
> >
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the
> OASIS TC), go to
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/egov/members/leave_workgroup.ph
> p.
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/egov/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>