Additional editorial comments to SMP 1.0 CSPRD02

[Kenneth Bengtsson <kbengtsson@efact.pe>]

Dear all

 

While preparing for our meeting on Wednesday I identified some additional (purely editorial) issues with SMP 1.0 CSPRD02:

 

1) Section 2.3.3.2: The line numbering has not been reset, but continues the line numbering from 2.3.2.2. First line should be “01”.

 

2) Section 2.4.7.1: In the HTML version (http://docs.oasis-open.org/bdxr/bdx-smp/v1.0/csprd02/bdx-smp-v1.0-csprd02.html) and PDF version (http://docs.oasis-open.org/bdxr/bdx-smp/v1.0/csprd02/bdx-smp-v1.0-csprd02.pdf), the pseudo-schema has line numbering (labelling the single line as line “04”). The normative (Word) version does not.

 

3) When we added section 3.2.1 we created a hanging paragraph in 3.2.

 

4) Section 3.2.1: In the HTML version (http://docs.oasis-open.org/bdxr/bdx-smp/v1.0/csprd02/bdx-smp-v1.0-csprd02.html) and PDF version (http://docs.oasis-open.org/bdxr/bdx-smp/v1.0/csprd02/bdx-smp-v1.0-csprd02.pdf), the samples have line numbering (labelling the single lines “05” and “06” respectively). The normative (Word) version does not.

 

5) Section 3.4 has a hanging paragraph.

 

6) Appendix C3: Line numbering has not been reset, but continues the line numbering from the example in C2. First line should be “01”.

 

7) Appendix D (Revision History) should be labelled “non-normative” for consistency (or should be removed entirely, contemplating that the next Committee Specification will be SMP 1.0 Candidate OASIS Standard).

 

I’m adding the above to a new comment resolution log document, which I will upload in a bit.

 

Best regards,

 

Kenneth