OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

bdxr message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [bdxr-comment] SV: [members] 30 day Public Review for Business Document Envelope V1.1 - ends May 20th


Dear Torsten

 

As promised the TC today began working on the comments received during the public review of BDE 1.1. Specifically regarding your comment about changing cardinality of the ToParty element to one or more (1..n), the question was raised whether such change would invalidate the confidentiality feature of BDE, obtained using payload encryption where the key of the recipient is used for the encryption ensuring that only the intended recipient is capable of understanding the content. If a BDE envelope was to have more than one recipient (ToParty), such one-to-one confidentiality would not be obtainable.

 

Erlend Klakegg Bergheim of the BDXR TC will contact you directly to better understand your requirement and how we may work out a solution.

 

Best regards,

 

Kenneth Bengtsson

 

 

 

From: <bdxr-comment@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Kenneth Bengtsson <kbengtsson@efact.pe>
Date: Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 2:49 PM
To: "Kirschner, Torsten" <Torsten.Kirschner@nav.no>, "'bdxr-comment@lists.oasis-open.org'" <bdxr-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>
Cc: "bdxr@lists.oasis-open.org" <bdxr@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: Re: [bdxr-comment] SV: [members] 30 day Public Review for Business Document Envelope V1.1 - ends May 20th

 

Dear Torsten

 

Thank you very much for your valuable input. The cardinality of the ToParty was indeed an issue that was discussed by the TC during the work on BDE 1.1. I will put your input in the list of comments received so that the TC may open this issue for further discussion after the public review, after which we will publish a resolution log with all comments and conclusions. I will let you know when the comment resolution log has been published, as well as of any questions to your requirement that may arise during the work.

 

Best regards,

 

Kenneth

 

 

From: <bdxr-comment@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of "Kirschner, Torsten" <Torsten.Kirschner@nav.no>
Date: Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 10:30 AM
To: "'bdxr-comment@lists.oasis-open.org'" <bdxr-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [bdxr-comment] SV: [members] 30 day Public Review for Business Document Envelope V1.1 - ends May 20th

 

Dear BDXR TC,

 

I have the following comment on the BDE v1.1:

In the European EESSI project – Electronic Exchange of Social Security Information, run by DG EMPL, we have a need to address multiple recipients of a document on business level.

If you could change the cardinality of the ToParty in the BDE from exactly one (1..1) to one or more (1..n), we could use the BDE in EESSI instead of a profile of the UN/CEFACT Standard Business Document Header (v1.3).

 

Best regards

Torsten

--

Med vennlig hilsen

Torsten Kirschner
områdearkitekt  

Elektronisk Samhandling //  Forvaltningsseksjonen
Prosjekt- og forvaltningsavdelingen // NAV IT
(: 928 27 731 // + torsten.kirschner@nav.no

 

 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]