[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [bdxr] SMP comment resolution
At 2016-05-27 05:07 +0000, Kenneth Bengtsson wrote:
As agreed at this weeks meeting I have continued working through the comments received to the SMP 1.0 public review
Thanks for your efforts.
...I would especially appreciate any opinions on comments PEPPOL-016 and PEPPOL-017:... PEPPOL-016, XML schema: http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing is not required: Any opinions?PEPPOL-017, XML schema: http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd is not required:Any opinions?
From my perspective I see no use for either of these declarations. I note they are not referenced in any way, and so I think having them there is of no use. I believe they can be removed without any consequence.
. . . . . . . Ken -- Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources | Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training @US$45: http://goo.gl/Dd9qBK | Crane Softwrights Ltd. _ _ _ _ _ _ http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ | G Ken Holman _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com | Google+ blog _ _ _ _ _ http://plus.google.com/+GKenHolman-Crane/posts | Legal business disclaimers: _ _ http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal | --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]