[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (BDXR-1) Include encryption certificate
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/BDXR-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=67292#comment-67292 ] Erlend Klakegg Bergheim commented on BDXR-1: -------------------------------------------- I'd like to propose to change certificate from 1..1 to 0..n where we add an attribute to the certificate element identifying certificate usage. Do we need a pre-defined set of certificate identifiers, or should identifiers be defined by the implementing community? > Include encryption certificate > ------------------------------ > > Key: BDXR-1 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/BDXR-1 > Project: OASIS Business Document Exchange (BDXR) TC > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Documentation, XML Schema > Affects Versions: SMP 2.0 > Reporter: Erlend Klakegg Bergheim > Priority: Minor > > SMP version 1.0 requires 1..1 certificates per transport profile per process identifier per document type identifier. > The current certificate element is used to provide certificate for validation of signature in transmission response. > Pim has requested support for encryption certificate: > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/bdxr/201501/msg00008.html -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]