[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (BDXR-24) Clarification of service field values
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/BDXR-24?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=76349#comment-76349 ] Kenneth Bengtsson commented on BDXR-24: --------------------------------------- For SMP 1.0, "http://docs.oasis-open.org/bdxr/ns/SMP/2016/05" should be used as service identifier in BDXL records ([http://docs.oasis-open.org/bdxr/bdx-smp/v1.0/os/bdx-smp-v1.0-os.html#_Toc490131056).] For SMP 2.0, "oasis-bdxr-smp-2" should be used ([https://docs.oasis-open.org/bdxr/bdx-smp/v2.0/cs02/bdx-smp-v2.0-cs02.html#_Toc30505049).] Â > Clarification of service field values > ------------------------------------- > > Key: BDXR-24 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/BDXR-24 > Project: OASIS Business Document Exchange (BDXR) TC > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Documentation > Affects Versions: Locator 1.0 > Reporter: Erlend Klakegg Bergheim > Priority: Minor > > In BDXL 1.0 chapter 4 Conformance is "Meta:SMP" listed as normative service field values. > In the same document in Appendix B is "meta:smp" returned. > Is the service field value case insensitive? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.3#803004)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]