RE: [bpel4people-editors] Editors - FW: [bpel4people] 10/15 BPEL4People

Given that the TC meeting has been cancelled let’s postpone meeting until next week when I’d like us to review PB2, 17, 19, 24 and hopefully the work items that Dieter is working on:

· BP-25 WS-HumanTask Attachment Info Data Type element contentType is ambiguous; Dieter Koenig

· LPG omnibus; Dieter Koenig

· BP-23 (Re-)Evaluation and instantiation of logical people groups

· BP-15 What is the purpose of the optional task name param in ht:getLogicalPeopleGroup()

· BP-6 Does ht:getLogicalPeopleGroup() cause an LPG to evaluate?

From: Luc Clement [mailto:luc.clement@activevos.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 19:54
To: bpel4people-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [bpel4people-editors] Editors - FW: [bpel4people] 10/15 BPEL4People TC - Cancel?
Importance: High

Editors: let’s only meet if the TC meets. If we do, the agenda I’m proposing is:

Review Updates:

· BP-2 Defer Activation Time is missing from HT protocol message; Michael Rowley

· Updated B4P

· BP-19 Using process variables in constellations 1 and 2; Michael Rowley

· Updated B4P

· BP-17 Define Conformance Targets; Ralf Mueller

· BP-24 getOutcome function missing in B4P spec; Ralf Mueller

· b4p/bpel4people-1.1-spec.doc

· Resolution for BP-17, BP-24, new revision: 55

· wsht/ws-humantask-1.1-spec.doc

· Resolution for BP-17, BP-24, new revision: 56

· xml/ws-humantask-context.xsd

· Resolution for BP-24, new revision: 57

From: Dave Ings [mailto:ings@ca.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 15:01
To: bpel4people@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [bpel4people] 10/15 BPEL4People TC - Cancel?
Importance: High

Hi,

It appears that not enough progress has been made on issues BP-28 and BP-41 to justify convening the TC on 10/15. Dieter could present the oft-deferred BP-12/20 but that would make for a very short meeting.

So I'm leaning towards cancellation this week, but I don't want to do so before I've polled the TC for additional agenda topics. Are there any other topics that would make convening the TC worthwhile?

Regards, Dave Ings,
Emerging Software Standards
Email: ings@ca.ibm.com
Yahoo Messenger: dave_ings

bpel4people-editors message