I’ve checked in changes for 36, 41, 45.
I’m giving up the pen.
Michael
From: Luc Clément
[mailto:luc.clement@activevos.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 11:33 AM
To: bpel4people-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [bpel4people-editors] Resolution applied to B4P - BP-72 - FW:
[bpel4people] BP-72: Add the definition of the Human Task Process term
I’ve updated the B4P spec to cover: Issue 72: add
WS-HumanTask and WS-HumanTask Processor definitions to section 2.3
We’re now at rev 114.
Michael still has the pen on the HT spec.
From: Luc Clément
[mailto:luc.clement@activevos.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 08:17
To: Dave Ings; bpel4people@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [bpel4people] BP-72: Add the definition of the Human Task
Process term
I took an action item yesterday to review BP-72. I propose the
following disposition:
1.
Add conformance target definitions to section “2.3 Conformance
Targets” of the B4P spec as noted at: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BP-72#action_13678:
Update section 2.3 Conformance
Targets by adding the following two bullets:
• WS-HumanTask Definition
A WS-HumanTask Definition is
any artifact that complies with the human interaction schema and additional
constraints as defined by the WS-HumanTask 1.1 specification.
• WS-HumanTask Processor
A WS-HumanTask Processor is any
implementation that accepts a WS-HumanTask definition and executes the
semantics as defined by the WS-HumanTask 1.1 specification.
2.
As for the need for a system component architecture diagram and
supporting text to address Yoichi’s concerns, I agree that this should be
handled as part of BP-65.
I would therefore propose that BP-72 be constrained to an update
of section 2.3 of the B4P spec. If the TC approves this proposal, the editors
(me) will be happy to make the update once BP-72 is accepted as “Resolved”
Luc
Luc Clément
Active Endpoints, Inc
+1.978.793.2162 | luc.clement@activevos.com
From: Dave Ings
[mailto:ings@ca.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 10:28
To: bpel4people@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [bpel4people] BP-72: Add the definition of the Human Task
Process term
My initial thought is that these suggestions
should be added to the system component architecture issue that Frank agreed to
handle
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BP-65
rather than being a standalone issue, but this is something we can discuss
during the TC.
Regards, Dave Ings,
Emerging Software Standards
Email: ings@ca.ibm.com
Yahoo Messenger: dave_ings
Luc Clément ---2009/02/18 09:54:54 AM---Assigned: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BP-72
From: Yoichi Takayama [mailto:takayama.yoichi@gmail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assigned: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BP-72
From: Yoichi Takayama [mailto:takayama.yoichi@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 23:48
To: Luc Clément
Cc: bpel4people@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: new issue request
Target:
bpel4people-1.1-spec-CD-02-MARKEDUP.pdf
Description:
This document mentions HumanTask Processor only
3 times in the Section 4.5.3.
920 A WS-HumanTask Processor MUST ...
928
HumanTask Processor hosting ...
948
... WS-HumanTask
949
Processor ...
While the
definition for a BPEL Processor is given in Section 2.3 as below, there appears to be no clear definition or reference
to what the HumanTask Processor is at this point (although the reader would
find it out in WS-HumanTask document later).
251
BPEL4People Processor
252
A BPEL4People Processor is any implementation that accepts a BPEL4People
definition and
253
executes the semantics defined in this document.
Except that The HumanTask Processor must also
return a metadata, and the metadata operation is said to refer Section 8.2 of
the WS-HumanTask document.
It seems that, before introducing a new term, it
is better to define it. Although the usage of the term is very limited in this
case, the term is neither common nor self-explanatory to someone who reads this
document (or works with this specification) for the first time.
Proposal:
Add the definition of the term at the beginning
of the block or immediately after the first usage.
Also, clarify what it is. (1) It may be rather
easy to say that it is a Web Service which hosts a Human Task and implements
WS-C to interact with the BPEL4People Processor. (2) The Task Processor must be
the WS-C WS-HT Protocol Service in WS-C nomenclature and probably it needs to
be clarified.
Notes:
In my opinion it is better to define a Task List
Manager sub-system who receives a Task request from BPEL4People processing
engine. A Task Processor would rather interact with the Task List Manager, not
the BPEL4People processing engine.
However, I understand that it could be said that
it is an implementation issue since this standard does not define anything
about the Task List Manager. However, this standard mentions (or the white
paper did mention) the way Task List client and Task client would work, and
probably that should be defined in the standard to have interpretability for
providers of these and a BPEL4people Processor.
Yoichi
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yoichi Takayama, PhD
Senior Research Fellow
RAMP Project
MELCOE (Macquarie E-Learning Centre of
Excellence)
MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY
Phone: +61 (0)2 9850 9073
Fax: +61 (0)2 9850 6527
www.mq.edu.au
www.melcoe.mq.edu.au/projects/RAMP/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY: CRICOS Provider No 00002J
This message is intended for the addressee named
and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this
message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views
of Macquarie E-Learning Centre Of Excellence (MELCOE) or Macquarie University.