[9:08] Dave Ings: Thursday 1/22 - 9 AM - 12:30 PM

Meeting will adjourn at 12:30, lunch will be served for those still present.

1. Final issue proposal discussions - up to 30 minutes

Dieter - http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BP-63
Michael - http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BP-44

2. Constellation 4 Interoperability - Further Discussion - Alex & Phil - up to 30 minutes

3. Working session on task routing proposal(s) - up to 3 hours

4. Final remarks / discussion of place and timing of next F2F - Chair
[9:38] Gerhard Pfau: Scribe: Gerhard
[9:40] Gerhard Pfau: Dieter presents proposed resolution of BP-63
[9:47] anonymous morphed into Hannah Petereit
[9:51] Gerhard Pfau: Dave assigns BP-63 (previously unassigned) to Dieter
[9:59] Gerhard Pfau: Michael presents proposed resolution for BP-44
[10:00] Dave Ings: Revised proposal email link: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/bpel4people/email/archives/200901/msg00041.html
[10:02] Gerhard Pfau: Michael moves o resolve BP-44, Dieter seconds
[10:03] Gerhard Pfau: Motion unanimously carried
[10:05] Gerhard Pfau: Alex presents thoughts on lean tasks, deployment, etc.
[10:35] Gerhard Pfau: Group discussion around how to create / start / delete lean task
[10:38] Gerhard Pfau: Discussion about extending people activity to invoke lean task in a new way (not via remote task)
[10:42] Gerhard Pfau: Discussion if lean tasks should have a rendering
[10:45] Gerhard Pfau: There is consensus in the room that lean tasks optionally can define a rendering
[10:47] Gerhard Pfau: Next steps: Alex and Phil to work with SAP to iterate the BP-44 proposal
[10:48] Gerhard Pfau: Goal is to present another iteration at the next TC meeting
[10:49] Gerhard Pfau: Coffee break until 10:55
[11:01] Gerhard Pfau: Meeting continues
[11:01] Gerhard Pfau: Alex is presenting motivational scenario for routing patterns
[11:02] Gerhard Pfau: .. using Sharepoint as an example
[11:03] Gerhard Pfau: Example scenario: Purchase Order Approval
[11:04] Gerhard Pfau: Supports adding tasks to a chain of tasks
[11:11] Gerhard Pfau: Currently don't use output. Instead uses comments and (the aggregate of) "approve" / "disapprove"
[11:13] Gerhard Pfau: Ralf presenting the Oracle routing pattern scenarios
[11:15] Gerhard Pfau: Oeacle uses task payload, not input / output when modeling a human task
[11:15] Gerhard Pfau: Task have a predefined (extensible) set of task outcomes
[11:16] Gerhard Pfau: Assignment and routing policies are assigned to a task: Single, Sequential, Parallel
[11:18] Gerhard Pfau: "Application roles" are used similar to LPGs. Alternatively people / groups / roles are used when defining the single / sequential / parallel
[11:19] Gerhard Pfau: Routing patterns can be nested
[11:21] Gerhard Pfau: Default outcome used when people do not respond in the expected amount of time
[11:24] Gerhard Pfau: Observation: HR people have the most complex routing requirements
[11:26] Gerhard Pfau: In collaboration mode in parallel the data is copied
[11:26] Gerhard Pfau: result aggregation: pick one
[11:28] Gerhard Pfau: From the process perspective a human task (routing task) is considered a black box
[11:43] Gerhard Pfau: Discussion about Oracle requiring ad-hoc subtasks in their scenario
[11:44] Gerhard Pfau: According to Ralf currently not required. The original task is temporarily transferred / shared.
[11:52] Gerhard Pfau: Oliver: HR scenario similar to BPMN subflow
[12:00] Gerhard Pfau: Alireza: Seems that the scenarios presented by both Oracle and Microsoft seem to be similar.
[12:12] Gerhard Pfau: Discussion: How to structure work on routing patterns / subtasks
[12:14] Gerhard Pfau: Proposal: Every 2nd week during the usual TC meeting have a meeting that brings people together working on routing patterns / subtasks
[12:16] Gerhard Pfau: Correction: Proposal: Every 2nd week during the usual TC meeting time slot have a meeting that brings people together working on routing patterns / subtasks.
[12:17] Gerhard Pfau: These meetings are informal.
[12:18] Gerhard Pfau: IBM is going to set up the first meeting (January 2.
[12:19] Gerhard Pfau: ... January 2
[12:19] Gerhard Pfau: January 28 )
[12:20] Gerhard Pfau: Dave discusses next steps
[12:21] Gerhard Pfau: Agreement that at least one more technical f2f is required
[12:22] Gerhard Pfau: Proposal to have next f2f sometime in May
[12:25] Gerhard Pfau: Proposal: Week of May 11: Start Tuesday 9am, end: Thursday noon
[12:26] Gerhard Pfau: Tentative location: US east coast
[12:27] Gerhard Pfau: There is agreement in the room to go ahead with the above proposal for the next f2f
[12:27] Gerhard Pfau: Dave declares meeting adjourned.