[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [bpel4people] BP-94: Proposal
Oliver and I have reviewed section 3.2.1 relating to the
BP-94 proposal; the slightly modified test is listed below. Regards, Alireza BP94-Proposed Text Change: In case a composite task is pre-defined as
such, the task model contains the definition of one or more sub-tasks.
Composite tasks come with the following additional attributes: ·
Composition Type (parallel |
sequential) Composite tasks
with composition type “parallel” allow multiple active sub-tasks at
the same time; sub-tasks are not in any order; composite tasks with composition
type “sequential” only allow sequential creation of sub-tasks in
the pre-defined order (a second listed sub-task must not be created before a
first listed sub-task has been terminated). ·
Instantiation Pattern (manual |
automatic) Composite tasks
with instantiation pattern “manual” expect the “actual
owner” to trigger the creation of pre-defined sub-tasks; composite tasks
with instantiation pattern “automatic” are automatically created at
the time the composite task itself turns into “in progress” status;
(where composition type is “parallel,” all pre-defined sub-tasks
are created at the time the composite task turns into “in progress”
status; where composition type is “sequential,” at the time the
composite task turns into “in progress” status, the first defined
sub-task in the sequence is created; the next sub-task in the sequence is
automatically created at the time its predecessor is terminated). |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]