[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [bpel4people] BP-92 Proposal
Hi Oliver, IMO, it would help to be more specific about when precisely routing patterns can be used as a special syntax for composite tasks. For example, something like: <spec-text> Routing patterns can be used as a convenient syntax to decribe the "who" in a composite task, where all of the following is true: - all subtasks have the same interface - all subtasks have an activation pattern of "automatic" - (whatever else is needed) </spec-text> You might then drop the later sentence "A composite task, including subtasks of different task types, can be desribed only using the composite task syntax". As a side remark, we need to clean up the usage of the term "task type" -- it is sometimes used in the sense of "task definition" (as opposed to "task instance") and sometimes in the sense of "task vs. notification" -- I will open a separate issue for this. Kind Regards Dieter König Senior Technical Staff Member, WebSphere Process Server Architect IBM Software Group, Application and Integration Middleware Software WSS Business Process Solutions Phone: +49-7031-16-3426 IBM Deutschland (Embedded image moved to file: pic24366.gif) E-Mail: dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com Schönaicher Str. 220 71032 Böblingen Germany IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH / Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter Geschäftsführung: Erich Baier Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294 From: "Kieselbach, Oliver" <oliver.kieselbach@sap.com> To: <bpel4people@lists.oasis-open.org> Date: 21.07.2009 18:57 Subject: [bpel4people] BP-92 Proposal Please check the comment (the last comment) in the Jira issue for the resolution proposal: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BP-92 Thanks -Oliver
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]