[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: terminology
Mark,
I
don't really like the word conductor, it reminds me trains not transactions. I
don't think coordinator is overloaded.
Cohesion sounds fine, although a little too academic.
How about "Web transactions" or "Light-weight transactions"?
Anyway, I think there is convergence on the terminology
and requirements. 4/30 is approaching, so do you think that you guys (the bt
models group) can start to put together a draft requirements/use
cases/terminology document that we can discuss at the 4/23
f2f?
Thanks: Pal
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC