Re: interposition requirements

[Mark Little <mcl@arjuna.com>]

> We can always define and disallow it per definition but it looks like an
> artificial restriction... because a service can always go around it by
> starting its own transaction under the cover and the main coordinator
> cannot do anything, cannot even aware of this new transaction.

The default should be that it interposition is available from a participant
then it should be used. However, I've nothing against it being a
configurable option as long as it is up to the participant to decide whether
it wants to allow it to be turned off.

Mark.

----------------------------------------------
Dr. Mark Little (mark@arjuna.com)
Transactions Architect, HP Arjuna Labs
Phone +44 191 2064538
Fax   +44 191 2064203