[bt-spec] BTP Issue 26 : Multiple conformance points should be defined.

[BTP issues maintainer <peter.furniss@choreology.com>]

This issue has been added to the BTP issue list

BTP Issue 26 : Multiple conformance points should be defined.

Category: technical
Submitter: Bill Cox, (for all BEA members)
Submitter's identification: issue E
Detail:
Alistair Green's and Mark Potts' separate suggestions on conformance
partially addresss the problems caused by combining cohesion and atomic.
Some restructuring of the Draft will be necessary, probably into separate
sections for atomic and cohesion.
Proposed Remedy:
I believe that these discussions are under way, but not yet reflected in
text.

---

To comment on this issue, please follow-up to this announcement on the bt-spec@lists.oasis-open.org (replying to this message should automatically send your message to that list).

The current draft, with line numbers is available in pdf format and word format.

To add a new issue, please email to Peter Furniss peter.furniss@choreology.com. It helps if you propose a category (technical, minor technical, editorial, minor editorial).