[bt-spec] BTP Issue 40 : Sending ENROLLED

[BTP issues maintainer <peter.furniss@choreology.com>]

This issue has been added to the BTP issue list

BTP Issue 40 : Sending ENROLLED

Submitter: Mark Little, HP
Category: editorial
Submitter's identification: #9
Description:
Page 16, change last bit of text to read: "A Superior need not acknowledge
that the Inferior has been enlisted in the relationship. However, if
requested to by the sender of ENROL (if the appropriate parameter on the
ENROL is set) then the Superior sends" and remove "if the appropriate
parameter on the ENROL asked for the reply" after the "in reply to ENROL."

We haven't really talked about "parameters" at this stage, and this rewording seems better IMO.

---

To comment on this issue, please follow-up to this announcement on the bt-spec@lists.oasis-open.org (replying to this message should automatically send your message to that list).

The current draft, with line numbers is available in pdf format and word format.

To add a new issue, please email to Peter Furniss peter.furniss@choreology.com. It helps if you propose a category (technical, minor technical, editorial, minor editorial).