[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [bt-spec] BTP Issue 50 : Default parameter values
First of all this doesn't address the text "did we
ever discuss"? My issue was also intended to start such a discussion if one had
not already occurred and been voted on.
This doesn't address the underlying
question of "what is the right default value".
OK, but again I'd like to have an all-party
discussion about what we think is the right default.
Not sure about this.
I disagree. In exactly the same argument as
for report_heuristic in the OTS, I think it should be a conscious effort by
someone to disable this, rather than enable it. Heuristics (or hazards)
potentially screw the entire application consistency, and I think the majority
of people would want to know about this by default. (It's a similar argument to
that used by JTA when it simply does not allow the possibility of programmers to
stop heuristic reporting.)
OK, but shouldn't this be in
a separate issue?
Mark.
----------------------------------------------
Dr. Mark Little Transactions Architect, HP Arjuna Labs Email: mark@arjuna.com | mark_little@hp.com Phone: +44 191 2064538 Fax : +44 191 2064203 |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC