Re: [bt-spec] BTP Issue 6 : Informative appendices - spec or primer

[Sazi Temel <sazi.temel@bea.com>]

I think the appendices should be out of the spec., but some of the
information in them may be put into the explanatory section that makes
the case for BTP. For example, an example of how BPML or WSPL may use BTP
could be (briefly) in the explanatory section, but entire appendices are
to much to be included in to the spec.

--Sazi
   '

At 06:50 PM 11/5/01 +0000, BTP issues maintainer wrote:

This issue has been added to the BTP issue list

BTP Issue 6 : Informative appendices - spec or primer

Source: Peter Furniss, Choreology / Mark Little, HP
Category: editorial
Reference: Appendices
Summary:
Should the informative appendices be re-instated in the spec, or left for incorporation in the intended primer. (They were dropped between 0.6 to 0.9 as part of the removal of explanatory and tutorial material - in consequence, the list of authors was modified, dropping the appendix authors).

---

To comment on this issue, please follow-up to this announcement on the bt-spec@lists.oasis-open.org (replying to this message should automatically go there).

The issues list will shortly be moved to the oasis website. The current draft, with line numbers is availiable in pdf format and word format.

To add a new issue, please email to Peter Furniss peter.furniss@choreology.com. It helps if you propose a category (technical, minor technical, editorial, minor editorial).

---

Sazi Temel
Principal Consultant,
eCommerce Services, bea Systems, inc. [www.bea.com]

---