bt-spec message

Subject: Re: [bt-spec] BTP Issue 60 : address-as-role or role address

From: Mark Little <mcl@arjuna.com>
To: Peter Furniss <peter.furniss@choreology.com>, bt-spec@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 16:35:08 +0000

The "address-as" form is clearer for description.

I'm not sure that this is the case actually. If we were to vote on this then I'd prefer "X address" rather than "address-as-X".

Suggestion:

Align them as address-as-whatever, changing the XML appropriately.

Whatever we do, we definitely need to be consistent.

Mark.

----------------------------------------------
Dr. Mark Little
Transactions Architect, HP Arjuna Labs
Email: mark@arjuna.com | mark_little@hp.com
Phone: +44 191 2064538
Fax : +44 191 2064203

References:
- RE: [bt-spec] BTP Issue 60 : address-as-role or role address
  - From: Peter Furniss <peter.furniss@choreology.com>