RE: [bt-spec] BTP Issue 40 : Sending ENROLLED

[Peter Furniss <peter.furniss@choreology.com>]

 

BTP Issue 40 : Sending ENROLLED

Submitter: Mark Little, HP
Category: editorial
Submitter's identification: #9
Description:
Page 16, change last bit of text to read: "A Superior need not acknowledge that the Inferior has been enlisted in the relationship. However, if requested to by the sender of ENROL (if the appropriate parameter on the ENROL is set) then the Superior sends" and remove "if the appropriate parameter on the ENROL asked for the reply" after the "in reply to ENROL."

We haven't really talked about "parameters" at this stage, and this rewording seems better IMO.

---

.   

Change suggested looks good, but the presentation of the messages sendable by each role may get radically altered by issue 61

 

Peter