RE: [bt-spec] BTP Issue 79 : Normalising the message set

[Peter Furniss <peter.furniss@choreology.com>]

This issue was discussed at the Liberty Corner ftf this morning.

 

The group concluded that it was a good idea, but that the messages should be given distinct names for the different uses on different relationships, rather than the qualifier.message style originally suggested. A set of name correspondences was drafted during the meeting (but not thrashed out in detail), as attached. This has been posted to the issues list as "outline solution".

 

(needs completing with a decision on the number of xml sub-schemas)

 

 

Peter

Proposed solution for Issue 79.doc