bt-spec message

Subject: [bt-spec] BTP Issue 96 : Reply address on SUPERIOR, INFERIOR_STATUS

From: BTP issues maintainer <peter.furniss@choreology.com>
To: bt-spec@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 15:26 +0000

This issue has been added to the BTP issue list

BTP Issue 96 : Reply address on SUPERIOR, INFERIOR_STATUS

Category: minor technical
Submitter: Pyounguk Cho, IONA (drafted PRF)
Description:
Reply address should be added to the parameter list when reply requested = true

The *_STATUS messages can be sent when the receiving side has no knowledge of the location or identity of the partner. If a reply is needed (it will be the /unknown), the responder needs to know where to send it.

To comment on this issue, please follow-up to this announcement on the bt-spec@lists.oasis-open.org (replying to this message should automatically send your message to that list).

The current draft, with line numbers is available in pdf format and word format.

To add a new issue, please email to Peter Furniss peter.furniss@choreology.com. It helps if you propose a category (technical, minor technical, editorial, minor editorial).