RE: [bt-spec] BTP Issue 62 : Names of the relationships (0.9.0.4solution)

[Peter Furniss <peter.furniss@choreology.com>]

No problem.

 

But as general point, at any time, a 0.9.x draft is liable to be an "editor's convenience draft", incorporating unagreed proposed changes. 0.9.0.2 is the current agreed draft; after Wednesday it will either be 0.9.0.4 (if they all go yes), or there won't immediately be an agreed draft (until some editing work is done)

 

Peter

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Sanjay Dalal [mailto:sanjay@bea.com]
Sent: 15 January 2002 15:51
To: Sanjay Dalal; Peter Furniss; 'Bt-Spec '
Subject: RE: [bt-spec] BTP Issue 62 : Names of the relationships (0.9.0.4 solution)

Please ignore...OORPMS (Out of Order Reading of Pending Mails Syndrome :)...vote is scheduled for tomorrow's meeting. Sorry for the spam.

 

You must have guessed that we may have alternate proposal :). Keep guessing...

 

 -----Original Message-----
From: Sanjay Dalal [mailto:sanjay@bea.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 6:26 AM
To: Peter Furniss; bt-spec@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [bt-spec] BTP Issue 62 : Names of the relationships (0.9.0.4 solution)

Was there any vote on this issue? Did I miss it? If not, then it should not go into the draft.

 

sanjay

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Furniss [mailto:peter.furniss@choreology.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 10:47 AM
To: bt-spec@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [bt-spec] BTP Issue 62 : Names of the relationships (0.9.0.4 solution)

This change has been applied in 0.9.0.4, using the names as convenient labels for the sets of relationships - outcome includes both Superior:Inferior and Enroller:Superior, control includes both Initiator:Factory and Terminator:Decider. The names are used semi-informally - as headings for the sublists of abstract message types. 

 

 BTP Issue 62 : Names of the relationships

Category: minor technical
Submitter: Alastair Green, Choreology
Description:
The two distinct relationships in BTP are called "Superior:Inferior" and "Terminator:Decider" in 0.9. These names are cumbersome, and in the latter case, not very accurate - the client-end application to coordination-facility relationship includes Initiator:Factory. Simple names would clarify.

The names "Control" relationship and "Outcome" relationship are suggested.

---

.