[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [bt-spec] RE: Handle definition missing
> The spec does talk about(/specify) Inferior-handle upfront in line 1176 in > version 0.9.1 and then it is used in the abstract message definitions as are > the other parameters, so it is mentioned and its role defined ahead of > appearing in the XML. > > Is this what you are looking for? If not would you like to propose a > definition? No. This just talks about what a Handle is for. I'm after a similar type of description as Identifier has on 3216. Mark. ---------------------------------------------- Dr. Mark Little, Distinguished Engineer, Transactions Architect, HP Arjuna Labs Email: mark_little@hp.com Phone: +44 191 2606216 Fax : +44 191 2606250
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC