[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [bt-spec] Context
Sazi, Yes - this is what issue 82 was about. The particular text is in description of the "CONTEXT_REPLY & ENROL & application message (& PREPARED)" group. (as with the application & CONTEXT, BTP can only describe what the relationship means at a conceptual level) There is also the Inferior name qualifier that can be present on ENROL, which is visible to the Terminator on INFERIOR_STATUSES, allowing the Terminator to correlate the inferiors it can see with the application work they correspond to. Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: Sazi Temel [mailto:sazi.temel@bea.com] > Sent: 04 February 2002 04:07 > To: Peter Furniss > Cc: spec > Subject: RE: [bt-spec] Context > > > > Peter, > Does BTP have the capability of correlating enrollees (participants) with > the application messages? Specially, when the transaction tree is > flattened > there may be more than one enrollee for a particular service > participating > to the same transaction (if the service calls other services in the same > transaction and the qualifier requires the transaction to be > flattened). In > this case, if a terminator tries to remove some of the enrollees from the > confirm-set it would have difficulty of identifying the enrollees... It > could not say, remove the enrollees that is related to service request A > etc. Perhaps this has been already addressed.. can you point me where in > the spec this might be discussed? Thanks. > > --Sazi >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC