[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [bt-spec] BTP Issue 99 : PREPARE_INFERIORS andFAULT(InvalidInferior)
I don't believe that it's pretty sure a
CANCEL of the whole cohesion is going to happen just because I send a
PREPARE_INFERIORS. I may be sending many such PREPARE_INFERIORS over a period of
hours or days and not make a choice until much later as to how to end the
cohesion. Or perhaps I've misunderstood what you
meant.
I disagree that there is little that can
happen when a warning occurs. Whatever called PREPARE_INFERIORS (whether
directly or via many layers of abstraction) had better expect that such an error
can occur and to be able to deal with it. What I'm saying is that we can say at
our level that "nothing will have prepared" if such an error occurs and that
gives the higher-level abstractions and business logic a better footing from
which to deal with the error than would otherwise be the case
IMO.
Agreed. This is purely a PREPARE_INFERIORS
issue.
Mark.
----------------------------------------------
Dr. Mark Little, Distinguished Engineer, Transactions Architect, HP Arjuna Labs Email: mark_little@hp.com Phone: +44 191 2606216 Fax : +44 191 2606250 |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC