RE: Remaining tasks on requirements

[Peter Furniss <peter.furniss@choreology.com>]

Pal,

Good summary - I hadn't fully taken on board the adjectival use of "cohesive
business transactions" and "atomic business transactions" - you have
summarised what was agreed. Would it still be in the spirit of that
agreement to refer to "atoms" and "cohesions" for brevity in the body of the
document ?

I am working on modifying Alastair's document in the light of last week.

Peter

------------------------------------------
Peter Furniss
Technical Director, Choreology Ltd
email:  peter.furniss@choreology.com
phone:  +44 20 7670 1679
direct: +44 20 7670 1783
mobile: 07951 536168
13 Austin Friars, London EC2N 2JX


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pal Takacsi-Nagy [mailto:pal.takacsi@bea.com]
> Sent: 26 April 2001 07:55
> To: business-transaction@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Remaining tasks on requirements
>
>
> After our f2f meeting it is time to finalize our
> requirement/model/terminology document.
>
> Peter, Alastair and Mark (Little): are you guys willing to update the BT
> model's group draft with the results of the f2f that my document meant to
> capture?
> Also the agreed requirements list needs to be cleaned up of editorials.
>
> Thanks: Pal
>
>
> -------------------------------
> Pal Takacsi-Nagy
> Staff Engineer
> BEA eCI division
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to:
> business-transaction-request@lists.oasis-open.org
>