[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: FW: (Per Mark Hale),RE: ebXML in W3C? and OASIS Business Transactiongroup
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark A. Hale [mailto:mark.hale@interwoven.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 5:37 PM > To: Bob Haugen; 'James Bryce Clark' > Cc: karl.best@oasis-open.org; 'Peter Furniss'; 'Eric Newcomer' > Subject: RE: (Per Mark Hale), RE: ebXML in W3C? and OASIS Business > Transactiongroup > > > Bob, > > I would be happy to arrange a telecon. I will be out next week. > If 7/17 9am works into everyone's schedule, I can arrange the lines. > > Thanks, > > Mark > > (Sorry - I can't post to the complete reply list because I don't > have privalages on ebxml-bp.) > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bob Haugen [mailto:linkage@interaccess.com] > > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 5:25 PM > > To: 'James Bryce Clark'; ebxml-bp@lists.ebxml.org > > Cc: mark.hale@interwoven.com; karl.best@oasis-open.org; 'Peter Furniss'; > > 'Eric Newcomer' > > Subject: RE: (Per Mark Hale), RE: ebXML in W3C? and OASIS Business > > Transactiongroup > > > > > > I'd be interested in a dispassionate conversation about how > > those who know both BTP and the ebXML-BP + UMM transaction > > protocol think the two compare and contrast. (The comparers > > would need to understand the UMM transaction patterns as > > well as BPSS, and don't get hung up on choreography details.) > > > > In other words, set aside anything accusatory, e.g. words > > like "conflict" and precedence and MOUs and see how the two > > initiatives might relate. Then we can get all mad at each > other later.8-) > > > > My first impressions were that BTP covers a lot of the same ground, > > even to the same idea of transactional behavior from the viewpoint > > of the initiator. As UN/CEFACT ebWG gets into collaboration patterns, > > the area of overlap will be larger. > > > > We've just had Jean-Jacques Dubray do a detailed comparison and > > binding between ebXML BPSS and BPML. Something similar needs > > to be done with the other collaboration choreography initiatives. > > > > -Bob Haugen > > > > (What was that quote about standards being wonderful because > > there were so many of them?) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: James Bryce Clark [SMTP:jamie.clark@mmiec.com] > > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 5:53 PM > > To: ebxml-bp@lists.ebxml.org > > Cc: mark.hale@interwoven.com; karl.best@oasis-open.org > > Subject: (Per Mark Hale), RE: ebXML in W3C? and OASIS > > Business Transactiongroup > > > > Forwarding this to the BP list from Mark Hale's post to the BTP list. > > > > At 03:32 PM 7/5/01, Mark A. Hale wrote: > > >Karl, > > > > > >I would just like to further support your stance that this is > > not duplicate > > >effort with ebXML. > > > > > >As an organization that endorsed the BTP submission and also > > being the ebXML > > >POC co-chair at the same time, I reviewed the submission as > > being entirely > > >complementary to ebXML. I fielded calls from other ebXML > > organizations in > > >the interim between submission and the start date in March. > Most of the > > >discussion emphasized that this technology does integrate into ebXML. > > >However, ebXML was on a schedule for May and it was not feasible to > > >introduce the topic and maintain the final date. ebXML has been > > considered > > >from the start. Conversely, BTP is nearing the end of its short > > life-cycle > > >and I would offer that we evaluate its direction at the final > > f2f to be held > > >later this month. > > > > > >I do not have post privileges on the ebxml-bp mailing list. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > > "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-bp-request@lists.ebxml.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC