[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [business-transaction] RE: This Thursday's teleconference
Unfortunately,
I have a conflict and cannot attend the call tomorrow. Alan Davies of SeeBeyond will be on the
call, but I don’t think he is currently a voting member. Do the bylaws allow that someone (e.g.,
Alan) can proxy my vote? -Steve -----Original
Message----- Just as FYI, from what I
know, in OASIS the vote is for individuals and not based on company i.e. each
individual has one vote. cheers -----Original
Message----- I agree Pyounguk has the
vote for IONA, and no one else does.
-----Original Message----- I haven't received anything from the chair
- I guess maybe we're a little old for warnings from the headteacher! From my
point if view, it was my responsibility to make the F2F meetings and the calls,
and I didn't make as many of them as I should have. However, it might be a good idea to get
clarification of these rules just in case the "blacklisted four"
might be able to voice an opinion. Jim -----Original
Message----- I
believe the oasis rules say that people don't get dropped unless they have
received a warning from the chair. Has anyone been warned recently ? Peter -----Original
Message----- OK, we should vote on
this tomorrow. One procedural point. According to my records the following
people are not currently voting members of the committee (even by the most lose
interpretation of the OASIS rules, i.e. we count only face-to-face meetings): Jim Webber (HP) - did not
attend the last f2f meetings, did not dial in on subsequent teleconferences and
as of yesterday unsubsribed from the mailing list Eric Newcomer (IONA) -
never attended a f2f neither called in for a teleconference Alex Ceponkus - not an
OASIS member Bill Pope - not an OASIS
member Pal -----Original
Message----- Given the
discussions generated over the last few weeks about the shape/content and
future of any BTP specification, and the delays to any attempts to adopt, we
the undersigned wish to call a formal vote on the following issue, to be
resolved at the next teleconference on 11th of October 2001: The
Technical Committee confirms the scope as determined by the last San Jose
face-to-face in late July and the subsequent quorate and minuted teleconference
of 16 August, namely: To
define the interoperable messages to be sent between initiators and the
factory, terminators and coordinators/composers, enrollers and superiors,
superiors and inferiors (including the roles and responsibilities of
sub-coordinators and sub-composers in a transaction tree), and the relationship
of contexts and replies to application messages, plus facilities for recovery
including message redirection, and compounding capability to allow one-shot
optimization and one-wire topology. A concrete binding to SOAP and
SOAP-with-attachments is included. Partial role-based conformance is defined. and
further resolves to close discussion on issues of scope in the interests of
rapid adoption of the Committee Specification. Mark Little
(HP), Jim Webber (HP), Eric Newcomer (IONA), Pyounguk Cho (IONA), Alex
Ceponkus, Alastair Green (Choreology), Peter Furniss (Choreology), Bill Pope,
James Tauber (Bowstreet) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC