RE: [business-transaction] SOAP Stuff

[Peter Furniss <peter.furniss@choreology.com>]

Jim (and others),

I put the current draft of the text for the bindings, including the binding
proforma and the SOAP bindings on the bt-spec list last night. For those not
subscribed, it should be in the archive.

Peter

> -----Original Message-----
> From: WEBBER,JIM (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex1) [mailto:jim_webber@hp.com]
> Sent: 18 October 2001 16:14
> To: btp
> Subject: [business-transaction] SOAP Stuff
>
>
> Hello BTP'ers,
>
> I have a question or two about BTP and its SOAP bindings which
> might sound a
> little naïve, but persevere with me :-)
>
> I've looked over the latest SOAP bindings bit of the spec and it all looks
> fine in terms of what we are going to serialise onto the wire, the message
> split between header/body, and so forth.
>
> However, I am wondering whether the intention is to use SOAP messages to
> carry around BTP messages or whether we can use SOAP RPC. Also, I wonder
> whether it would be possible/desirable to put some kind of flag in the
> header (for BTP-only messages) that indicates the presence of a
> BTP message
> in the body so that a SOAP server can pick up on this and take action as
> appropriate.
>
> If anyone has any ideas, could they either bring them up via the mailing
> list, or at today's teleconference?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Jim
> --
> Dr. James Webber
> Hewlett-Packard Arjuna Lab
> http://www.arjuna.com
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>