[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [business-transaction] Comments on today's conference call
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Davies [mailto:ADavies@SeeBeyond.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:30 PM
To: 'business-transaction@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject: [business-transaction] Comments on today's conference callAll,I am somewhat surprised and concerned about the process employed in this Technical Committee.My previous experience of such working groups (primarily with X/Open) is that a 'ratchet' effect is desired, in which, after having agreed which way is forward (i.e. what the requirements are which we're trying to meet), we all aim to ensure that changes will result in overall progress in that direction.However, sometimes it is the case that in order to go forward, we must go back a little.It is encumbent on any member making any change proposal to offer a convincing explanation why the end result will be a net gain. It is also in the interests of the proposing member to do so, otherwise the work put into developing the proposed change will be wasted if it is voted down. Generally speaking, the bigger the proposed step backward, the stronger and more comprehensive is required the case for why it will eventually be beneficial.I would expect at this stage of development of a specification that the current document should be under change control, and that any proposed changes are made in writing, with reference to the current working document. Members should be given several days to evaluate,consider and comment on proposed changes before being asked to vote on them. Members should be encouraged to provide explanations of their reasons for a NO vote. A proposed change which is voted down should be able to be resubmitted - suitably reworked to deal with previous objections.BEA believes it has a strong case for a making one or more major changes to the current working specification. I would welcome seeing these presented as complete and comprehensive change requests, delivered to the group as described above, for our consideration.I would also expect BEA to honorably accept the decisions of the group with respect to such change requests when dealt with as described above, and continue to be a valuable and active member of the group.I believe we are all reasonable people - let's keep moving forward.Regards, Alan.
Alan DaviesVP Standards & Product Strategy
ph: (626)471-6050 (direct)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC