[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [business-transaction] HPs position on BEAs proposal andtheChoreology response
> One compromise can be to produce 2 specifications: BTP - Atoms and BTP - > Cohesions. And no coupling between the two. This approach is in line with > the layered protocols design principle. HTTP does not have any special > coupling with SOAP and vica versa. And that's why we all like and use them. Then why not call them Level 1 Compliance, and Level 2 Compliance, for example? The specification then need not say that in order to use atoms you need cohesions. As soon as we have two specifications, we have two levels of conformance anyway. As I said earlier, we are in favour of conformance profiles, and that's as far as we're prepared to go at this stage. Mark. ---------------------------------------------- Dr. Mark Little Transactions Architect, HP Arjuna Labs Email: mark@arjuna.com | mark_little@hp.com Phone: +44 191 2064538 Fax : +44 191 2064203
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC