RE: [business-transaction] PREPARE_INFERIORS

[Peter Furniss <peter.furniss@choreology.com>]

> > The list is closed for new technical issues. I've been trying to avoid
> > getting to issue 100, but there are bound to be editorials, so
> we're going
> > to go over, aren't we.
>
> I think that it's useful to close the list prior to a release of the spec.
> However, we can't prevent new issues from coming up and some of them (and
> I'm not saying the issue I raised falls into this category) will
> need to be
> addressed before the spec. can be released. Do we need a formal rule for
> "bumping" issues across release boundaries? I'd hope that such
> issues would
> be blatantly obvious as to their importance, but you never know.

I'd assumed that "deferred" was one of the possible resolutions to an
issue - whenever it came in.

Peter