[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [business-transaction] Updated Minutes for 16 January 2002
Bill, William Bathurst was standing in for myself due to a meeting clash. Geoff. William Cox wrote: > BTP Meeting Minutes 16 January 2002 (updated version) > (Raw notes from Bill Bathurst, Bill Cox) > > Agenda: > > Issues Votes > Timeframe/Schedule Discussions > Primer Outline > > Attendees: > Members: > Bill Cox > Alex Ceponkus > Peter Furniss > Victor Corrales > Tony Fletcher > Sanjay Dalal > Pyounguk Cho > Mark Little > Steve White > Alex Berson > Gordon Hamilton > Sazi Temel > Jim Webber > Steve Viens > Doug Bunting > (Bill Pope could not attend; Bill Cox chaired the meeting.) > > Observer: > Bill Bathurst, Oracle. > > Selected Document Issues and proposed resolutions were discussed, and > all but one accepted by unanimous consent: > > #7 Accepted > #57 Accepted > #62 Accepted > #79 Accepted > #80 Accepted > #82 Deferred. Anyone who was involved in this discussion *should* > use the BTP mailing list to further articulate their ideas, > suggestions,etc. > #83 Accepted > #84 Accepted > #85 Accepted > #86 Accepted > > Timeframes/Schedule: > > There was a spirited discussion on realistic timeframes for finishing a > committee draft. This agenda item was present to get us to start > examining a realistic schedule for the endgame of BTP 1.0. No formal > votes were take, so notes below indicate the sense of the meeting. > Straw man proposal for discussion: > > * Model and Primer required for D 0.95 and later > * Complete Draft 0.95 end of February (and stop modifying the draft for > review) > * Face-to-face, probably at Oracle, in March (dates TBD, 3-4 weeks after > > stable D 0.95) > * Complete updated Draft 0.99 reflecting committee review mid-April, > suitable for broader review > * 4 week review period ending mid-May > * Committee Draft with issues resolved or listed as open, end of May > > Summary of discussion: D 0.95 target date of Feb 13th - Feb 27th is > achievable, with more participation of members (consensus). > > Brief sermon from Bill Cox on participation if we're going to make the > timetable under discussion -- issues processing is critical, and there's > > not much discussion. > > In informal discussion, the group agreed that model and primer are > needed for completion, and that a detailed review/walkthrough F2F was > needed of the next stable draft. Several members suggested that both > the model and primer are necessary for the next review: it's hard to get > > people to review our document when they have to dedicate several days to > > the task. > > Peter suggested that D 0.99 could be completed within 4 weeks after D > 0.95, and that D 1.0 could then be completed within an additional 1-2 > weeks. Discussion on having two 4-week review periods or one. No > consensus reached. Four weeks from draft to draft does not allow a four > week review period. Further discussion needed. > > We discussed requirements for moving the committee draft to OASIS. Three > > implementations, complete and consistent document are required; no one > knew the precise requirements. Someone noted that this group should > avoid the same mistakes made in developing the JMS specification (moving > > too quickly to get a consistent set of semantics) > > Need more member involvement in this process. > > Primer Outline: > > Brief discussion; people seemed to think it was a good start. Comments > via email requested. > > Action Items > > All: Work on resolving issues so we can get to a complete reviewable > draft. > > Next meeting is Jan 30th.
begin:vcard n:Brown;Geoff tel;cell:415 298 7580 tel;work:650 506 3230 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:ATS - Core Technologies;Oracle Corporation adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:Geoffrey.Brown@oracle.com title:Technical Director fn:Geoff Brown end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC