Re: [business-transaction] BT TC con call - April 17 - details andagendaitems

[Geoffrey Brown <Geoffrey.Brown@oracle.com>]

I have a meeting class with the BTP call, therefore I should be on the call
by 9:30 PST.

Geoff.


William Z Pope wrote:

> BTP TC conference call for Wednesday April 17
> =====================================================================
> Call details, thanks to Choreology for hosting!
>
> Date:  Wednesday, April 17, 2002
> Time:  4:00 PM GMT
> Duration:  2 Hours
> Participants:  11
> Title:  OASIS BTP meeting
> Options:  Start recording call using control pad
> Generate unique access codes for this call
> Block use of the toll-free number
>
> To join this conference:
>
> For quick access, go to https://www.spiderphone.com/86211710
> (This link will help connect both your browser and telephone to the call)
>
> OR dial +1 (212) 812-2800 and enter 8621 1710
>
> To see if your browser is configured to use the web-enhanced features of
> your call,
> go to http://www.spiderphone.com/BrowserCheck
>
> =====================================================================
> Agenda:
>   - Greet, rustle, settle in (5 minutes)
>   - Establish minute taker for this meeting
>   - Call roll
>   - Accept previous minutes
>   - Set agenda
>     Proposed items below and others from the TC
>   - general meeting, discussion, votes
>   - review outstanding action item
>
> Items for Agenda:
> - What's needed for committee draft?
>   This item may simply be a forward reference to the issues listed
>   below.
> - Schedule
>   Committee draft out of Newcastle meeting?
> - Face to Face in Newcastle
>   - Who is attending?
> - What issues are open and how are they to be dealt with?
>   - Issue 87: Conformance
>     The change to resolve this issue was voted down.  What's needed to
>     resolve?
>   - Issue 89: J2EE Inter-operability - JMS short circuit.
>     There is a proposed XML representation for BTP state.
>   - Issue 108: Participant and service identification.
>     The change to resolve this issue has been voted and agreed.  Is
>     there more that needs to be done?
>   "Model issues"
>   - Issue 24: The apparent complexity of the model is too great
>     State diagrams for hazard and termination protocol needed?
>   - Issue 25: Conformance (depends on issue 87)
>   - Issue 66: Event diagram for termination protocol
>   - Issue 73: ACID relaxation in overview
>     There is no explicit comparison to traditional ACID transactions
>     in the draft 0.9.5 text.
>   Editorial comments
>   a) Tree composition is top down only
>   b) Compensatable versus cancellable as a BTP requirement
>
> Regards,
> TC Chair
>
> William Z Pope
> zpope@pobox.com
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

Attachment: Geoffrey.Brown.vcf
Description: Card for Geoffrey Brown