Re: [business-transaction] WS-I

[Mark Little <mark_little@hp.com>]

I would suspect there would be considerable opposition from some large
companies not involved with BTP but who have a big stake in the Web Services
market.

Mark.

----- Original Message -----
From: <bill.flood@sybase.com>
To: "Peter Furniss" <peter.furniss@choreology.com>
Cc: "OASIS BTP (Main List)" <business-transaction@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 6:10 PM
Subject: [business-transaction] WS-I


>
>
> Gents,
>
> I'm wondering if anyone within the  BTP working group is interested in
> trying to establish a profile for transactions within the WS-I group.
This
> effort will undoubtedly be very controversial as some of the major WS-I
> players may have other implementations in mind that do not yet address
> transactions within the standardization community..
>
> Right now the basic profile is all that is being discussed but the group
> will be entertaining suggestions for other profiles within the next 180
> days and some effort is necessary to push this through the board.  Some of
> the member companies have a presence at WSI and may be interested in
trying
> to start such an initiative in hopes of further institutionalizing BTP.
>
> My hope is that getting BTP on the table early may lessen the number of
> competing standards as far as transaction models for e-Business.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bill
>
>
> Bill Flood
> Sybase
> (925) 236-6830
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>