[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [business-transaction] Regarding issue #89
So you are advocating that we add things
into the specification that we know are incomplete simply for users to test? We
certainly wouldn't be the first specification body to do that, but that doesn't
mean we have to! We have spent a long time on most (all?) of the minutae within
the specification to at least see that it fits into the whole picture we've been
trying to aim at. Now you appear to be saying we can add things just to see how
they work in practice (or more accurately how they hold up) or as place holders
for things that may or may not occur later. If that is the case then I would
suggest we extend the deadline for the 1.0 and let all committee members go back
to their respective implementers and ask them what features they'd like hooks
for in the spec.
Mark.
----------------------------------------------
Dr. Mark Little (mark_little@hp.com) Transactions Architect, HP Arjuna Labs Phone +44 191 2606216 Fax +44 191 2606250 |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC