[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Groups - Conference Call modified
Conference Call has been modified by Peter Furniss (peter.furniss@choreology.com). Date: Tuesday, 14 September 2004 Time: 12:00pm - 01:00pm Eastern Time Event Description: Choreology to host: +44 20 8322 2500 (within the uk, 0870 410 7851 is supposed to work) access code is 926970 Agenda: Agenda: 1. Role call 2. Minutes from Aug 31 call 3. XML schema The XML schema is currently included by reference as a normative part of the document. The natural language and the XML schema are intended to say the same thing. It is probably that conflicts between the two expressions will arise. Is a conflict resolution mechanism necessary? If such a mechanism is necessary what should it be? Suggestions have been made that the natural language text should be definitive and the XML should be definiitive. 4. WSDL Should the WSDL be included in the specification either directly or by reference? Is the WSDL a normative part of the specification? If the WSDL is to be normative conflicts between the WSDL and the natural language elements of the specification are likely to arise. What is the mechanism for resolving conflicts between the two expressions? Minutes: View event details: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/business-transaction/event.php?event_id=5877 PLEASE NOTE: If the above link does not work for you, your email application may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your web browser. Referenced Items Date Name Type ---- ---- ---- 31 Aug 2004 2004-08-31-ConCall.txt Reference Document
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]