2) We talked about the new commands and targets that Allan proposed. The action is to clean up the proposal a bit and make it a little more generic and review on the next call.Â
3) We talked through the Digital Signatures proposal that I have put together. Here is a link to the document for your review. Everyone seemed to like this proposal, but everyone needs time to review. This is really a denseÂconcept. Also we may move the public key to the JWS header portion and I need to clean up the example toÂinclude a digital certificate and not just public/private keys.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fg8C3mvJJQyrcit74vySAm5XzIKnI5O5XFcDFHO5MQ8/edit#heading=h.a5du9cilv8pi4) We talked about restructuring the document and moving the data types in section 2 to the end of the document or an appendix. We would leave section 2 and the intro, just move the 5 pages of data types to improve readability. Everyone was okay with this. So we will get this done.
5) We will move all but one example out of the appendix and into a separate committee note. This will enable us to update the committee note more quickly and add examples over time without needing to release a new version of the spec. Everyone was okay with this.
6) We talked about the proposal from Vasileios on the industry sector vocab. We decided to do some more cleanup on this and review again on our next call so that we can get it added to the document.
7) I introduced the problem with vocabs having dashes and the features vocab and a property name error in section 4. But we ran out of time and will pick this up on our next call.
Items we did not get to:
a) address readability issues in section 3
Thanks all for joining today.
Bret and Allan